CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ProbKnot & RSpredict(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ProbKnot RSpredict(20)
MCC 0.650 > 0.631
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.636 ± 0.100 > 0.582 ± 0.112
Sensitivity 0.677 > 0.569
Positive Predictive Value 0.631 < 0.706
Total TP 567 > 476
Total TN 90579 < 90804
Total FP 482 > 273
Total FP CONTRA 103 > 73
Total FP INCONS 229 > 125
Total FP COMP 150 > 75
Total FN 270 < 361
P-value 1.10039559051e-07

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ProbKnot and RSpredict(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and RSpredict(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and RSpredict(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ProbKnot and RSpredict(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and RSpredict(20)).

^top





Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 567
Total TN 90579
Total FP 482
Total FP CONTRA 103
Total FP INCONS 229
Total FP COMP 150
Total FN 270
Total Scores
MCC 0.650
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.636 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.677
Positive Predictive Value 0.631
Nr of predictions 30

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 26 0 6 20 3
2XQD_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1108 2 0 0 2 0
2XXA_G 0.25 0.26 0.26 9 2011 26 1 24 1 26
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 9 0 5 4 4
3IZ4_A 0.59 0.61 0.57 58 25435 49 17 26 6 37
3IZF_C 0.90 0.91 0.89 32 2604 7 0 4 3 3
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 8 0 5 3 5
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J2L_3 0.79 0.76 0.81 26 2988 11 0 6 5 8
3J3D_C 0.46 0.53 0.42 10 944 14 6 8 0 9
3J3E_7 0.60 0.56 0.66 19 2712 11 1 9 1 15
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2718 37 6 18 13 15
3J3F_7 0.94 0.89 1.00 32 2902 3 0 0 3 4
3J3F_8 0.39 0.47 0.33 9 4734 38 9 9 20 10
3NPB_A 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2247 9 0 4 5 10
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.29 11 4726 42 10 17 15 11
3O58_2 0.91 0.94 0.88 29 2721 10 0 4 6 2
3PDR_A 0.88 0.92 0.85 46 4786 10 5 3 2 4
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.69 0.65 20 1502 11 6 5 0 9
3ZEX_D 0.90 0.86 0.94 30 2764 7 0 2 5 5
3ZEX_C 0.48 0.52 0.45 15 5341 22 4 14 4 14
3ZND_W 0.24 0.38 0.16 3 1172 26 9 7 10 5
4A1C_2 0.17 0.25 0.13 5 4477 49 13 21 15 15
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 1 1 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.52 0.53 0.53 8 481 8 0 7 1 7
4FRG_B 0.38 0.38 0.41 9 1180 13 6 7 0 15

^top



Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 476
Total TN 90804
Total FP 273
Total FP CONTRA 73
Total FP INCONS 125
Total FP COMP 75
Total FN 361
Total Scores
MCC 0.631
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.582 ± 0.112
Sensitivity 0.569
Positive Predictive Value 0.706
Nr of predictions 30

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.53 0.50 0.60 9 342 7 0 6 1 9
2XKV_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1831 4 1 3 0 11
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.50 0.26 1.00 9 2036 0 0 0 0 26
3AMU_B 0.69 0.53 0.91 10 1146 2 0 1 1 9
3IZ4_A 0.61 0.57 0.67 54 25455 38 13 14 11 41
3IZF_C 0.94 0.91 0.97 32 2607 4 0 1 3 3
3J20_1 0.67 0.50 0.91 10 1101 2 0 1 1 10
3J20_0 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 1198 3 1 1 1 2
3J2L_3 0.71 0.59 0.87 20 2997 6 0 3 3 14
3J3D_C 0.82 0.84 0.80 16 948 4 3 1 0 3
3J3E_7 0.82 0.79 0.84 27 2709 7 0 5 2 7
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2724 19 5 13 1 15
3J3F_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 2898 3 1 1 1 2
3J3F_8 0.42 0.47 0.38 9 4737 26 9 6 11 10
3NPB_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2272 6 1 5 0 37
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.30 11 4727 29 15 11 3 11
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 10 0 2 8 2
3PDR_A 0.80 0.70 0.92 35 4802 5 1 2 2 15
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 1 0 0 3
3SD1_A 0.82 0.86 0.78 25 1501 7 5 2 0 4
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 7 0 2 5 6
3ZEX_C 0.34 0.31 0.38 9 5350 19 3 12 4 20
3ZND_W 0.47 0.38 0.60 3 1186 9 0 2 7 5
4A1C_2 0.25 0.30 0.21 6 4487 30 12 11 7 14
4A1C_3 0.60 0.49 0.75 18 2739 8 0 6 2 19
4AOB_A 0.33 0.21 0.55 6 1426 5 1 4 0 23
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.51 0.40 0.67 6 487 3 0 3 0 9
4FRG_B 0.19 0.13 0.33 3 1193 6 1 5 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.