CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	RNASLOpt		Cylofold
MCC	0.622	>	0.612
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.654 ± 0.118	<	0.681 ± 0.101
Sensitivity	0.598	=	0.598
Positive Predictive Value	0.658	>	0.638
Total TP	383	=	383
Total TN	41887	>	41869
Total FP	244	<	255
Total FP CONTRA	55	<	60
Total FP INCONS	144	<	157
Total FP COMP	45	>	38
Total FN	257	=	257
P-value	0.00181847574797

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Cylofold).
Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Cylofold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Cylofold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Cylofold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Cylofold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Cylofold).

^top

Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	383
Total TN	41887
Total FP	244
Total FP CONTRA	55
Total FP INCONS	144
Total FP COMP	45
Total FN	257

Total Scores
MCC	0.622
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.654 ± 0.118
Sensitivity	0.598
Positive Predictive Value	0.658
Nr of predictions	35

^top

2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.48	0.39	0.64	7	517	4	0	4	0	11
2LDL_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	131	1	0	0	1	0
2LI4_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	175	0	0	0	0	0
2LK3_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	91	0	0	0	0	0
2LKR_A	-	0.70	0.69	0.71	20	2412	13	1	7	5	9
2LWK_A	-	0.95	0.91	1.00	10	197	1	0	0	1	1
3J0L_h	-	0.81	0.66	1.00	21	2119	0	0	0	0	11
3J0L_2	-	0.49	0.46	0.52	12	2227	18	0	11	7	14
3J0L_7	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	506	13	3	10	0	10
3J0L_a	-	0.21	0.18	0.29	2	404	6	3	2	1	9
3J0L_1	-	0.73	0.62	0.89	8	475	4	0	1	3	5
3J0L_g	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	174	4	0	2	2	2
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.63	0.57	0.71	12	1142	5	0	5	0	9
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.74	0.76	0.73	16	1197	7	3	3	1	5
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	20	1092	1	0	0	1	0
3J2C_O	-	0.72	0.68	0.76	28	3950	13	2	7	4	13
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.68	0.74	23	2989	11	0	8	3	11
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.95	0.92	1.00	11	143	0	0	0	0	1
3TRZ_Z	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	87	2	0	0	2	0
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	103	0	0	0	0	0
3U4M_B	-	0.49	0.55	0.46	12	1250	14	3	11	0	10
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.55	0.50	0.62	8	1280	9	1	4	4	8
3VJR_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	239	0	0	0	0	0
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.90	0.85	0.97	28	1960	2	0	1	1	5
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.74	1.00	26	2770	4	0	0	4	9
3ZEX_E	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	8254	55	20	30	5	34
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	96	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.31	0.28	0.38	8	1416	13	3	10	0	21
4ATO_G	-	0.36	0.43	0.33	3	211	6	6	0	0	4
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	461	0	0	0	0	4
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.73	0.60	0.90	9	486	1	1	0	0	6
4FNJ_A	-	-0.05	0.00	0.00	0	239	11	0	11	0	12
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.60	0.58	0.64	14	1180	8	3	5	0	10
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.19	0.18	0.22	5	1825	18	6	12	0	23
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	89	0	0	0	0	0

^top

Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	383
Total TN	41869
Total FP	255
Total FP CONTRA	60
Total FP INCONS	157
Total FP COMP	38
Total FN	257

Total Scores
MCC	0.612
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.681 ± 0.101
Sensitivity	0.598
Positive Predictive Value	0.638
Nr of predictions	35

^top

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.64	0.61	0.69	11	512	5	1	4	0	7
2LDL_A	-	0.81	0.67	1.00	6	134	0	0	0	0	3
2LI4_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	175	0	0	0	0	0
2LK3_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	91	0	0	0	0	0
2LKR_A	-	0.56	0.55	0.57	16	2412	13	4	8	1	13
2LWK_A	-	0.95	0.91	1.00	10	197	1	0	0	1	1
3J0L_h	-	0.55	0.50	0.62	16	2114	10	2	8	0	16
3J0L_2	-	0.49	0.46	0.52	12	2227	18	0	11	7	14
3J0L_7	-	0.41	0.50	0.36	5	505	10	3	6	1	5
3J0L_a	-	0.17	0.18	0.20	2	401	9	3	5	1	9
3J0L_1	-	0.73	0.62	0.89	8	475	3	0	1	2	5
3J0L_g	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	174	4	0	2	2	2
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.90	0.81	1.00	17	1142	0	0	0	0	4
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.74	0.76	0.73	16	1197	7	3	3	1	5
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.75	0.68	15	1090	8	2	5	1	5
3J2C_O	-	0.51	0.49	0.54	20	3950	19	1	16	2	21
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.68	0.74	23	2989	11	0	8	3	11
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.63	0.42	1.00	5	149	0	0	0	0	7
3TRZ_Z	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	87	1	0	0	1	0
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	103	0	0	0	0	0
3U4M_B	-	0.49	0.55	0.46	12	1250	14	3	11	0	10
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.45	0.50	0.42	8	1274	18	4	7	7	8
3VJR_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	239	0	0	0	0	0
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.48	0.45	0.52	15	1960	15	1	13	1	18
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.69	0.69	0.71	24	2762	11	5	5	1	11
3ZEX_E	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	8258	51	15	31	5	34
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	96	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.42	0.38	0.48	11	1414	13	3	9	1	18
4ATO_G	-	0.88	1.00	0.78	7	211	2	2	0	0	0
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	15	457	0	0	0	0	0
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.97	1.00	0.94	15	480	1	1	0	0	0
4FNJ_A	-	0.81	0.67	1.00	8	242	0	0	0	0	4
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.88	1.00	21	1181	0	0	0	0	3
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.23	0.18	0.31	5	1832	11	7	4	0	23
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	89	0	0	0	0	0

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]