CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASLOpt & Pknots [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASLOpt Pknots
MCC 0.623 > 0.577
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.650 ± 0.107 < 0.654 ± 0.107
Sensitivity 0.587 < 0.606
Positive Predictive Value 0.672 > 0.560
Total TP 447 < 462
Total TN 53929 > 53769
Total FP 284 < 448
Total FP CONTRA 70 < 100
Total FP INCONS 148 < 263
Total FP COMP 66 < 85
Total FN 315 > 300
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and Pknots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Pknots).

  2. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and Pknots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Pknots).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Pknots).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Pknots).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and Pknots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Pknots).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and Pknots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and Pknots).

^top





Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 447
Total TN 53929
Total FP 284
Total FP CONTRA 70
Total FP INCONS 148
Total FP COMP 66
Total FN 315
Total Scores
MCC 0.623
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.650 ± 0.107
Sensitivity 0.587
Positive Predictive Value 0.672
Nr of predictions 44

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.48 0.39 0.64 7 517 4 0 4 0 11
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.70 0.69 0.71 20 2412 13 1 7 5 9
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
3J0L_h - 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 2119 0 0 0 0 11
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.18 0.29 2 404 6 3 2 1 9
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 4 0 1 3 5
3J0L_8 - 0.74 0.57 1.00 4 72 0 0 0 0 3
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.46 0.52 12 2227 18 0 11 7 14
3J16_L 0.63 0.57 0.71 12 1142 5 0 5 0 9
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3J2L_3 0.71 0.68 0.74 23 2989 11 0 8 3 11
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 2 0 0 2 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3UZL_B 0.55 0.50 0.62 8 1280 9 1 4 4 8
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.90 0.85 0.97 28 1960 2 0 1 1 5
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 914 0 0 0 0 4
3ZEX_G - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6507 0 0 0 0 45
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.74 1.00 26 2770 4 0 0 4 9
3ZEX_H - 0.27 0.37 0.21 7 3592 26 16 10 0 12
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.34 0.31 10 5342 36 8 14 14 19
4A1C_3 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2732 5 0 4 1 10
4A1C_2 0.30 0.40 0.24 8 4482 35 13 13 9 12
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.31 0.28 0.38 8 1416 13 3 10 0 21
4ATO_G - 0.36 0.43 0.33 3 211 6 6 0 0 4
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FNJ_A - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 239 11 0 11 0 12
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10
4FRN_A 0.19 0.18 0.22 5 1825 18 6 12 0 23
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 462
Total TN 53769
Total FP 448
Total FP CONTRA 100
Total FP INCONS 263
Total FP COMP 85
Total FN 300
Total Scores
MCC 0.577
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.654 ± 0.107
Sensitivity 0.606
Positive Predictive Value 0.560
Nr of predictions 44

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.83 0.83 0.83 15 510 3 2 1 0 3
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.48 0.55 0.43 16 2403 23 9 12 2 13
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 0.38 0.27 0.60 3 202 3 0 2 1 8
3J0L_h - 0.67 0.66 0.70 21 2110 11 4 5 2 11
3J0L_a - 0.35 0.36 0.36 4 400 8 3 4 1 7
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_7 - 0.38 0.50 0.31 5 503 12 3 8 1 5
3J0L_g - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 171 5 3 2 0 2
3J0L_2 - 0.44 0.46 0.43 12 2222 23 1 15 7 14
3J16_L 0.41 0.43 0.41 9 1137 13 1 12 0 12
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J2L_3 0.79 0.79 0.79 27 2986 12 1 6 5 7
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.33 0.36 0.32 8 1251 17 4 13 0 14
3UZL_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 1277 7 0 0 7 0
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.78 0.76 0.81 25 1958 7 1 5 1 8
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 910 12 0 4 8 4
3ZEX_G - 0.45 0.49 0.42 22 6455 39 9 21 9 23
3ZEX_D 0.31 0.34 0.30 12 2756 28 5 23 0 23
3ZEX_H - 0.26 0.37 0.19 7 3588 33 14 16 3 12
3ZEX_C 0.10 0.14 0.08 4 5322 54 13 35 6 25
4A1C_3 0.28 0.30 0.28 11 2723 30 4 25 1 26
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.29 8 4488 36 9 11 16 12
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.19 0.21 0.21 6 1409 23 3 19 1 23
4ATO_G - 0.36 0.43 0.33 3 211 6 6 0 0 4
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 2 0 0 2 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FNJ_A - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 240 10 0 10 0 12
4FRG_B 0.55 0.50 0.63 12 1183 7 0 7 0 12
4FRN_A 0.57 0.54 0.63 15 1824 9 3 6 0 13
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.