CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASLOpt & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASLOpt RNAwolf
MCC 0.582 > 0.441
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.624 ± 0.091 > 0.520 ± 0.096
Sensitivity 0.568 > 0.455
Positive Predictive Value 0.605 > 0.437
Total TP 676 > 542
Total TN 128049 > 127926
Total FP 580 < 840
Total FP CONTRA 151 < 199
Total FP INCONS 291 < 500
Total FP COMP 138 < 141
Total FN 515 < 649
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 676
Total TN 128049
Total FP 580
Total FP CONTRA 151
Total FP INCONS 291
Total FP COMP 138
Total FN 515
Total Scores
MCC 0.582
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.624 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.568
Positive Predictive Value 0.605
Nr of predictions 59

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.48 0.39 0.64 7 517 4 0 4 0 11
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.70 0.69 0.71 20 2412 13 1 7 5 9
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LU0_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 424 0 0 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
2M58_A - 0.37 0.33 0.44 4 535 5 4 1 0 8
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.18 0.29 2 404 6 3 2 1 9
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.46 0.52 12 2227 18 0 11 7 14
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_h - 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 2119 0 0 0 0 11
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 4 0 1 3 5
3J0L_8 - 0.74 0.57 1.00 4 72 0 0 0 0 3
3J16_L 0.63 0.57 0.71 12 1142 5 0 5 0 9
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2C_O - 0.72 0.68 0.76 28 3950 13 2 7 4 13
3J2C_M - 0.46 0.49 0.44 47 39819 77 22 37 18 49
3J2L_3 0.71 0.68 0.74 23 2989 11 0 8 3 11
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2724 30 6 12 12 15
3J3E_7 0.61 0.56 0.68 19 2713 10 1 8 1 15
3J3F_8 0.39 0.47 0.32 9 4733 38 10 9 19 10
3J3F_7 0.21 0.22 0.22 8 2898 28 3 25 0 28
3J3V_B 0.60 0.59 0.62 16 2630 14 2 8 4 11
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 2 0 0 2 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3UZL_B 0.55 0.50 0.62 8 1280 9 1 4 4 8
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W1K_J 0.93 0.90 0.97 28 1649 1 1 0 0 3
3W3S_B 0.90 0.85 0.97 28 1960 2 0 1 1 5
3ZEX_H - 0.27 0.37 0.21 7 3592 26 16 10 0 12
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 914 0 0 0 0 4
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.34 0.31 10 5342 36 8 14 14 19
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.74 1.00 26 2770 4 0 0 4 9
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 8254 55 20 30 5 34
3ZEX_G - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6507 0 0 0 0 45
3ZND_W 0.26 0.38 0.19 3 1175 22 7 6 9 5
4A1C_2 0.30 0.40 0.24 8 4482 35 13 13 9 12
4A1C_3 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2732 5 0 4 1 10
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.31 0.28 0.38 8 1416 13 3 10 0 21
4ATO_G - 0.36 0.43 0.33 3 211 6 6 0 0 4
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FNJ_A - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 239 11 0 11 0 12
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10
4FRN_A 0.19 0.18 0.22 5 1825 18 6 12 0 23
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 19 1063 0 0 0 0 5
4JRC_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 16 606 0 0 0 0 1

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 542
Total TN 127926
Total FP 840
Total FP CONTRA 199
Total FP INCONS 500
Total FP COMP 141
Total FN 649
Total Scores
MCC 0.441
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.520 ± 0.096
Sensitivity 0.455
Positive Predictive Value 0.437
Nr of predictions 59

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 9 512 7 0 7 0 9
2LDL_A - 0.88 0.78 1.00 7 133 0 0 0 0 2
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 1 0 0 1 0
2LI4_A - 0.96 0.93 1.00 13 176 0 0 0 0 1
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.84 0.79 0.88 23 2414 11 0 3 8 6
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 1 0 0 1 0
2LU0_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 423 0 0 0 0 1
2LWK_A - 0.48 0.45 0.56 5 198 5 0 4 1 6
2M58_A - 0.60 0.58 0.64 7 533 4 1 3 0 5
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.14 2 397 13 4 8 1 9
3J0L_2 - 0.14 0.15 0.15 4 2223 26 4 19 3 22
3J0L_g - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 171 7 4 1 2 2
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 509 10 1 9 0 10
3J0L_h - 0.47 0.41 0.57 13 2117 12 1 9 2 19
3J0L_1 - 0.68 0.54 0.88 7 476 5 0 1 4 6
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J16_L 0.58 0.57 0.60 12 1139 9 2 6 1 9
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 2 9 1 9
3J20_1 0.53 0.55 0.52 11 1091 11 4 6 1 9
3J2C_O - 0.41 0.44 0.40 18 3942 30 7 20 3 23
3J2C_M - 0.21 0.25 0.19 24 39797 113 35 69 9 72
3J2L_3 0.71 0.71 0.73 24 2987 13 1 8 4 10
3J3D_C 0.92 0.95 0.90 18 948 3 2 0 1 1
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2719 37 6 17 14 15
3J3E_7 0.57 0.56 0.59 19 2709 15 1 12 2 15
3J3F_8 0.28 0.37 0.23 7 4730 39 9 15 15 12
3J3F_7 0.27 0.28 0.28 10 2898 27 4 22 1 26
3J3V_B 0.59 0.59 0.59 16 2629 16 1 10 5 11
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 142 0 0 0 0 0
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 103 6 0 5 1 5
3U4M_B - 0.50 0.50 0.52 11 1255 12 1 9 2 11
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 1 0 0 1 0
3W1K_J 0.81 0.77 0.86 24 1650 5 0 4 1 7
3W3S_B 0.70 0.70 0.72 23 1957 10 0 9 1 10
3ZEX_H - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3593 33 17 15 1 19
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 910 17 0 4 13 4
3ZEX_C 0.08 0.10 0.07 3 5328 43 18 25 0 26
3ZEX_D 0.26 0.26 0.27 9 2763 24 8 16 0 26
3ZEX_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 8244 60 23 37 0 34
3ZEX_G - 0.20 0.20 0.21 9 6465 37 13 20 4 36
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 15 0 4 11 2
4A1C_2 0.12 0.15 0.10 3 4487 38 12 14 12 17
4A1C_3 0.32 0.30 0.35 11 2732 21 1 19 1 26
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.26 0.24 0.30 7 1414 17 2 14 1 22
4ATO_G - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 213 7 4 3 0 7
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 10
4FNJ_A - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 243 7 0 7 0 12
4FRG_B 0.54 0.50 0.60 12 1182 8 3 5 0 12
4FRN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1828 20 1 19 0 28
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0
4JF2_A 0.72 0.67 0.80 16 1062 4 4 0 0 8
4JRC_A - 0.71 0.65 0.79 11 608 3 2 1 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.