CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	RNASampler(20)		CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC	0.774	>	0.760
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.779 ± 0.117	>	0.769 ± 0.134
Sensitivity	0.700	<	0.744
Positive Predictive Value	0.862	>	0.783
Total TP	238	<	253
Total TN	22670	>	22623
Total FP	62	<	102
Total FP CONTRA	7	<	22
Total FP INCONS	31	<	48
Total FP COMP	24	<	32
Total FN	102	>	87
P-value	5.33374751016e-06

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

^top

Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	238
Total TN	22670
Total FP	62
Total FP CONTRA	7
Total FP INCONS	31
Total FP COMP	24
Total FN	102

Total Scores
MCC	0.774
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.779 ± 0.117
Sensitivity	0.700
Positive Predictive Value	0.862
Nr of predictions	14

^top

2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.94	0.94	0.94	17	339	2	0	1	1	1
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.95	0.95	0.95	18	1138	4	0	1	3	1
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	20	1092	1	0	0	1	0
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.90	0.90	0.90	19	1198	3	1	1	1	2
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.56	0.50	0.63	17	2993	12	3	7	2	17
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	20	846	0	0	0	0	4
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.81	0.69	0.95	20	1512	1	0	1	0	9
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.83	0.69	1.00	24	2772	1	0	0	1	11
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.90	0.81	1.00	30	2733	0	0	0	0	7
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.24	0.25	0.24	5	4495	30	3	13	14	15
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.70	0.59	0.85	17	1417	4	0	3	1	12
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.68	0.47	1.00	7	465	0	0	0	0	8
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	485	0	0	0	0	4
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.64	0.54	0.76	13	1185	4	0	4	0	11

^top

Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	253
Total TN	22623
Total FP	102
Total FP CONTRA	22
Total FP INCONS	48
Total FP COMP	32
Total FN	87

Total Scores
MCC	0.760
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.769 ± 0.134
Sensitivity	0.744
Positive Predictive Value	0.783
Nr of predictions	14

^top

2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.94	0.94	0.94	17	339	2	0	1	1	1
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.95	0.95	0.95	18	1138	4	0	1	3	1
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	20	1092	1	0	0	1	0
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.41	0.52	0.34	11	1187	22	7	14	1	10
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.94	0.94	0.94	32	2986	8	0	2	6	2
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.75	1.00	18	848	0	0	0	0	6
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.66	0.90	19	1512	2	1	1	0	10
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.83	0.91	29	2764	8	0	3	5	6
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.80	0.78	0.83	29	2728	7	0	6	1	8
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.24	0.25	0.24	5	4495	29	8	8	13	15
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.72	1.00	21	1416	1	0	0	1	8
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	461	0	0	0	0	4
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	485	0	0	0	0	4
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.43	0.50	0.40	12	1172	18	6	12	0	12

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]