CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of McQFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & McQFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) McQFold
MCC 0.751 > 0.641
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.774 ± 0.073 > 0.683 ± 0.107
Sensitivity 0.663 > 0.648
Positive Predictive Value 0.856 > 0.641
Total TP 594 > 581
Total TN 92168 > 91955
Total FP 209 < 419
Total FP CONTRA 41 < 109
Total FP INCONS 59 < 217
Total FP COMP 109 > 93
Total FN 302 < 315
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and McQFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and McQFold).

  2. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and McQFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and McQFold).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and McQFold).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and McQFold).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and McQFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and McQFold).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and McQFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and McQFold).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 594
Total TN 92168
Total FP 209
Total FP CONTRA 41
Total FP INCONS 59
Total FP COMP 109
Total FN 302
Total Scores
MCC 0.751
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.774 ± 0.073
Sensitivity 0.663
Positive Predictive Value 0.856
Nr of predictions 34

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 14 0 0 14 0
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 2 0 0 2 7
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.34 0.11 1.00 4 2041 0 0 0 0 31
3A2K_C 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1087 0 0 0 0 1
3AMU_B 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 1138 4 0 1 3 1
3G4S_9 0.73 0.54 1.00 14 2722 4 0 0 4 12
3GX2_A 0.88 0.79 1.00 22 1427 1 0 0 1 6
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.41 0.65 39 25476 26 15 6 5 56
3IZF_C 0.92 0.86 1.00 30 2610 2 0 0 2 5
3J20_0 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 1198 3 1 1 1 2
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.56 0.50 0.63 17 2993 12 3 7 2 17
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3JYX_4 0.61 0.83 0.45 10 4734 26 10 2 14 2
3JYX_3 0.70 0.60 0.82 9 2367 14 0 2 12 6
3LA5_A 0.89 0.80 1.00 20 934 0 0 0 0 5
3NPB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 21 2257 5 0 0 5 16
3O58_2 0.93 0.87 1.00 27 2727 5 0 0 5 4
3O58_3 0.51 0.50 0.52 11 4743 19 5 5 9 11
3PDR_A 0.84 0.76 0.93 38 4799 5 1 2 2 12
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.81 0.69 0.95 20 1512 1 0 1 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.35 0.31 0.39 9 5351 21 3 11 7 20
3ZEX_D 0.83 0.69 1.00 24 2772 1 0 0 1 11
4A1C_3 0.90 0.81 1.00 30 2733 0 0 0 0 7
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 30 3 13 14 15
4AOB_A 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 1417 4 0 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 465 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.64 0.54 0.76 13 1185 4 0 4 0 11

^top



Performance of McQFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for McQFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 581
Total TN 91955
Total FP 419
Total FP CONTRA 109
Total FP INCONS 217
Total FP COMP 93
Total FN 315
Total Scores
MCC 0.641
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.683 ± 0.107
Sensitivity 0.648
Positive Predictive Value 0.641
Nr of predictions 34

^top



2. Individual counts for McQFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 14 0 0 14 0
2XKV_B 0.33 0.36 0.31 4 1822 27 2 7 18 7
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.27 0.26 0.30 9 2015 22 0 21 1 26
3A2K_C 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1087 0 0 0 0 1
3AMU_B 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1141 4 0 1 3 4
3G4S_9 0.39 0.42 0.37 11 2706 22 6 13 3 15
3GX2_A 0.56 0.57 0.57 16 1421 13 4 8 1 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.46 0.46 0.47 44 25442 56 14 36 6 51
3IZF_C 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2607 7 0 4 3 6
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.71 0.68 0.74 23 2989 11 0 8 3 11
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1091 20 4 16 0 20
3JYX_4 0.35 0.58 0.22 7 4724 33 17 8 8 5
3JYX_3 0.28 0.40 0.20 6 2348 24 17 7 0 9
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.90 0.81 1.00 30 2248 5 0 0 5 7
3O58_2 0.93 0.87 1.00 27 2727 2 0 0 2 4
3O58_3 0.30 0.36 0.25 8 4732 27 15 9 3 14
3PDR_A 0.83 0.80 0.87 40 4794 9 2 4 3 10
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.82 0.83 0.83 24 1504 5 1 4 0 5
3ZEX_C 0.33 0.34 0.32 10 5343 25 4 17 4 19
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.66 0.88 23 2770 6 1 2 3 12
4A1C_3 0.28 0.30 0.28 11 2724 30 4 24 2 26
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.16 5 4484 33 11 16 6 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.