CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) RNAwolf
MCC 0.716 > 0.438
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.708 ± 0.108 > 0.460 ± 0.117
Sensitivity 0.666 > 0.454
Positive Predictive Value 0.776 > 0.434
Total TP 339 > 231
Total TN 45519 > 45424
Total FP 158 < 374
Total FP CONTRA 28 < 77
Total FP INCONS 70 < 224
Total FP COMP 60 < 73
Total FN 170 < 278
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 339
Total TN 45519
Total FP 158
Total FP CONTRA 28
Total FP INCONS 70
Total FP COMP 60
Total FN 170
Total Scores
MCC 0.716
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.708 ± 0.108
Sensitivity 0.666
Positive Predictive Value 0.776
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 1138 4 0 1 3 1
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 1198 3 1 1 1 2
3J2L_3 0.56 0.50 0.63 17 2993 12 3 7 2 17
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_8 0.19 0.20 0.19 3 2726 21 5 8 8 12
3J3E_7 0.80 0.76 0.84 26 2710 6 0 5 1 8
3J3F_8 0.43 0.47 0.39 9 4738 20 6 8 6 10
3J3F_7 0.78 0.72 0.84 26 2903 5 0 5 0 10
3J3V_B 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2635 4 0 0 4 6
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.81 0.69 0.95 20 1512 1 0 1 0 9
3ZEX_D 0.83 0.69 1.00 24 2772 1 0 0 1 11
3ZEX_C 0.35 0.31 0.39 9 5351 21 3 11 7 20
3ZND_W 0.58 0.75 0.46 6 1178 18 4 3 11 2
4A1C_3 0.90 0.81 1.00 30 2733 0 0 0 0 7
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 30 3 13 14 15
4AOB_A 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 1417 4 0 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 465 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.64 0.54 0.76 13 1185 4 0 4 0 11

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 231
Total TN 45424
Total FP 374
Total FP CONTRA 77
Total FP INCONS 224
Total FP COMP 73
Total FN 278
Total Scores
MCC 0.438
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.460 ± 0.117
Sensitivity 0.454
Positive Predictive Value 0.434
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3J20_1 0.53 0.55 0.52 11 1091 11 4 6 1 9
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 2 9 1 9
3J2L_3 0.71 0.71 0.73 24 2987 13 1 8 4 10
3J3D_C 0.92 0.95 0.90 18 948 3 2 0 1 1
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2719 37 6 17 14 15
3J3E_7 0.57 0.56 0.59 19 2709 15 1 12 2 15
3J3F_8 0.28 0.37 0.23 7 4730 39 9 15 15 12
3J3F_7 0.27 0.28 0.28 10 2898 27 4 22 1 26
3J3V_B 0.59 0.59 0.59 16 2629 16 1 10 5 11
3RKF_A 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 845 1 0 1 0 4
3SD1_A 0.58 0.59 0.59 17 1504 12 2 10 0 12
3ZEX_D 0.26 0.26 0.27 9 2763 24 8 16 0 26
3ZEX_C 0.08 0.10 0.07 3 5328 43 18 25 0 26
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 15 0 4 11 2
4A1C_3 0.32 0.30 0.35 11 2732 21 1 19 1 26
4A1C_2 0.12 0.15 0.10 3 4487 38 12 14 12 17
4AOB_A 0.26 0.24 0.30 7 1414 17 2 14 1 22
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 10
4FRG_B 0.54 0.50 0.60 12 1182 8 3 5 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.