CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.705 > 0.683
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.708 ± 0.195 > 0.697 ± 0.178
Sensitivity 0.630 < 0.653
Positive Predictive Value 0.795 > 0.723
Total TP 136 < 141
Total TN 17643 > 17619
Total FP 58 < 74
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 16
Total FP INCONS 29 < 38
Total FP COMP 23 > 20
Total FN 80 > 75
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 136
Total TN 17643
Total FP 58
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 23
Total FN 80
Total Scores
MCC 0.705
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.708 ± 0.195
Sensitivity 0.630
Positive Predictive Value 0.795
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.81 0.69 0.95 20 1512 1 0 1 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.35 0.31 0.39 9 5351 21 3 11 7 20
4A1C_3 0.90 0.81 1.00 30 2733 0 0 0 0 7
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 30 3 13 14 15
4AOB_A 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 1417 4 0 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 465 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 141
Total TN 17619
Total FP 74
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 38
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 75
Total Scores
MCC 0.683
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.697 ± 0.178
Sensitivity 0.653
Positive Predictive Value 0.723
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.49 0.45 0.54 13 5350 15 2 9 4 16
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.