CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) MCFold
MCC 0.696 > 0.616
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.699 ± 0.128 > 0.664 ± 0.154
Sensitivity 0.620 < 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.788 > 0.565
Total TP 268 < 294
Total TN 37360 > 37180
Total FP 116 < 300
Total FP CONTRA 27 < 86
Total FP INCONS 45 < 140
Total FP COMP 44 < 74
Total FN 164 > 138
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 268
Total TN 37360
Total FP 116
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 45
Total FP COMP 44
Total FN 164
Total Scores
MCC 0.696
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.699 ± 0.128
Sensitivity 0.620
Positive Predictive Value 0.788
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2KE6_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 451 1 0 0 1 2
2KUR_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 450 0 0 0 0 2
2KUU_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 431 1 0 0 1 2
2KUV_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 422 0 0 0 0 2
2KUW_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 454 1 0 0 1 2
2L1F_B 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 774 0 0 0 0 7
2L1F_A 0.83 0.70 1.00 16 747 0 0 0 0 7
2L94_A 0.70 0.56 0.91 10 346 2 0 1 1 8
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 10 0 10 0 18
3A3A_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 18 1482 0 0 0 0 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3J3E_8 0.18 0.20 0.18 3 2725 22 5 9 8 12
3J3F_8 0.47 0.47 0.47 9 4742 18 5 5 8 10
3JYX_4 0.70 0.83 0.59 10 4739 13 6 1 6 2
3O58_3 0.54 0.50 0.58 11 4745 13 5 3 5 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.31 0.50 9 5356 14 2 7 5 20
4A1C_2 0.40 0.40 0.40 8 4496 20 4 8 8 12
4JF2_A 0.64 0.42 1.00 10 1072 0 0 0 0 14

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 294
Total TN 37180
Total FP 300
Total FP CONTRA 86
Total FP INCONS 140
Total FP COMP 74
Total FN 138
Total Scores
MCC 0.616
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.664 ± 0.154
Sensitivity 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.565
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 1 0 0 1 0
2KE6_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 449 1 0 0 1 0
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 448 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 429 1 0 0 1 0
2KUV_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 420 0 0 0 0 0
2KUW_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 452 1 0 0 1 0
2L1F_B 0.80 0.79 0.83 19 768 4 0 4 0 5
2L1F_A 0.79 0.78 0.82 18 741 4 0 4 0 5
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.44 0.44 0.47 8 511 10 0 9 1 10
3A3A_A 0.98 0.97 1.00 29 1471 0 0 0 0 1
3IVN_B 0.45 0.48 0.46 11 879 14 5 8 1 12
3J3E_8 0.15 0.20 0.12 3 2716 36 11 12 13 12
3J3F_8 0.14 0.21 0.10 4 4720 51 17 20 14 15
3JYX_4 0.36 0.58 0.23 7 4725 37 19 5 13 5
3O58_3 0.28 0.36 0.22 8 4727 39 14 15 10 14
3RKF_A 0.89 0.88 0.91 21 843 3 0 2 1 3
3SD1_A 0.43 0.45 0.43 13 1503 17 1 16 0 16
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.27 10 5337 28 6 21 1 19
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 45 12 19 14 15
4JF2_A 0.74 0.75 0.75 18 1058 7 1 5 1 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.