CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	RNASampler(seed)		MXScarna(20)
MCC	0.670	>	0.640
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.695 ± 0.170	>	0.671 ± 0.188
Sensitivity	0.604	<	0.626
Positive Predictive Value	0.748	>	0.661
Total TP	113	<	117
Total TN	23092	>	23066
Total FP	63	<	117
Total FP CONTRA	17	<	29
Total FP INCONS	21	<	31
Total FP COMP	25	<	57
Total FN	74	>	70
P-value	0.0

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and MXScarna(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and MXScarna(20)).
Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and MXScarna(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and MXScarna(20)).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and MXScarna(20)).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and MXScarna(20)).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and MXScarna(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and MXScarna(20)).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and MXScarna(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and MXScarna(20)).

^top

Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	113
Total TN	23092
Total FP	63
Total FP CONTRA	17
Total FP INCONS	21
Total FP COMP	25
Total FN	74

Total Scores
MCC	0.670
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.695 ± 0.170
Sensitivity	0.604
Positive Predictive Value	0.748
Nr of predictions	9

^top

2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2KDQ_B	mir-TAR links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	10	164	0	0	0	0	0
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.70	0.56	0.91	10	346	2	0	1	1	8
3IVN_B	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	19	884	0	0	0	0	4
3JYX_4	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.70	0.83	0.59	10	4739	13	6	1	6	2
3O58_3	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.54	0.50	0.58	11	4745	13	5	3	5	11
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	20	846	0	0	0	0	4
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.72	0.55	0.94	16	1516	1	0	1	0	13
3ZEX_C	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.39	0.31	0.50	9	5356	14	2	7	5	20
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.40	0.40	0.40	8	4496	20	4	8	8	12

^top

Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	117
Total TN	23066
Total FP	117
Total FP CONTRA	29
Total FP INCONS	31
Total FP COMP	57
Total FN	70

Total Scores
MCC	0.640
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.671 ± 0.188
Sensitivity	0.626
Positive Predictive Value	0.661
Nr of predictions	9

^top

2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2KDQ_B	mir-TAR links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	10	164	0	0	0	0	0
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.73	0.72	0.76	13	340	5	0	4	1	5
3IVN_B	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.81	0.74	0.89	17	884	2	2	0	0	6
3JYX_4	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.70	0.83	0.59	10	4739	32	5	2	25	2
3O58_3	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.62	0.59	0.65	13	4744	18	5	2	11	9
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.75	1.00	18	848	0	0	0	0	6
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.74	0.76	0.73	22	1503	9	6	2	1	7
3ZEX_C	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.35	0.31	0.41	9	5352	15	3	10	2	20
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.22	0.25	0.21	5	4492	36	8	11	17	15

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]