CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & RNASampler(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) RNASampler(20)
MCC 0.670 > 0.666
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.695 ± 0.170 < 0.697 ± 0.215
Sensitivity 0.604 < 0.647
Positive Predictive Value 0.748 > 0.691
Total TP 113 < 121
Total TN 23092 > 23068
Total FP 63 < 99
Total FP CONTRA 17 < 21
Total FP INCONS 21 < 33
Total FP COMP 25 < 45
Total FN 74 > 66
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and RNASampler(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and RNASampler(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and RNASampler(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and RNASampler(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and RNASampler(20)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 113
Total TN 23092
Total FP 63
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 21
Total FP COMP 25
Total FN 74
Total Scores
MCC 0.670
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.695 ± 0.170
Sensitivity 0.604
Positive Predictive Value 0.748
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.70 0.56 0.91 10 346 2 0 1 1 8
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3JYX_4 0.70 0.83 0.59 10 4739 13 6 1 6 2
3O58_3 0.54 0.50 0.58 11 4745 13 5 3 5 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.31 0.50 9 5356 14 2 7 5 20
4A1C_2 0.40 0.40 0.40 8 4496 20 4 8 8 12

^top



Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 121
Total TN 23068
Total FP 99
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 45
Total FN 66
Total Scores
MCC 0.666
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.697 ± 0.215
Sensitivity 0.647
Positive Predictive Value 0.691
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3JYX_4 0.61 0.83 0.45 10 4734 26 10 2 14 2
3O58_3 0.51 0.50 0.52 11 4743 19 5 5 9 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.81 0.69 0.95 20 1512 1 0 1 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.35 0.31 0.39 9 5351 21 3 11 7 20
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 30 3 13 14 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.