CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & CentroidHomfold‑LAST [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC 0.664 > 0.638
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.629 ± 0.164 < 0.644 ± 0.222
Sensitivity 0.518 < 0.617
Positive Predictive Value 0.862 > 0.672
Total TP 131 < 156
Total TN 15092 > 15012
Total FP 28 < 92
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 26
Total FP INCONS 17 < 50
Total FP COMP 7 < 16
Total FN 122 > 97
P-value 1.81480685939e-07

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  2. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 131
Total TN 15092
Total FP 28
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 17
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 122
Total Scores
MCC 0.664
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.629 ± 0.164
Sensitivity 0.518
Positive Predictive Value 0.862
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.57 0.39 0.88 7 349 2 0 1 1 11
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 0 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.74 0.67 0.84 16 847 3 1 2 0 8
3SD1_A 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 1513 3 2 1 0 12
3W3S_B 0.71 0.52 1.00 17 1972 2 0 0 2 16
4A1C_2 0.50 0.25 1.00 5 4511 2 0 0 2 15
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 2 0 0 2 8
4ENB_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 466 0 0 0 0 9
4ENC_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 490 0 0 0 0 9
4FRG_B 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 1185 0 0 0 0 7
4FRN_A 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 1827 2 1 1 0 9

^top



Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 156
Total TN 15012
Total FP 92
Total FP CONTRA 26
Total FP INCONS 50
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 97
Total Scores
MCC 0.638
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.644 ± 0.222
Sensitivity 0.617
Positive Predictive Value 0.672
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 517 11 0 11 0 18
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
3W3S_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 29 1960 1 0 0 1 4
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 1 0 0 1 8
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.43 0.50 0.40 12 1172 18 6 12 0 12
4FRN_A 0.37 0.46 0.32 13 1807 28 11 17 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.