CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) Fold
MCC 0.733 > 0.609
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.658 ± 0.101 < 0.664 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.617 < 0.639
Positive Predictive Value 0.871 > 0.582
Total TP 698 < 723
Total TN 509671 > 509229
Total FP 180 < 679
Total FP CONTRA 34 < 142
Total FP INCONS 69 < 378
Total FP COMP 77 < 159
Total FN 434 > 409
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and Fold).

  2. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and Fold).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and Fold).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and Fold).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and Fold).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and Fold).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 698
Total TN 509671
Total FP 180
Total FP CONTRA 34
Total FP INCONS 69
Total FP COMP 77
Total FN 434
Total Scores
MCC 0.733
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.658 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.617
Positive Predictive Value 0.871
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 448 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 429 1 0 0 1 0
2KUV_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 420 0 0 0 0 0
2KUW_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 454 2 0 1 1 3
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 371 0 0 0 0 16
2L1F_A 0.68 0.61 0.78 14 745 4 0 4 0 9
2L1F_B 0.65 0.58 0.74 14 772 5 0 5 0 10
2L94_A 0.57 0.39 0.88 7 349 2 0 1 1 11
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 0 12 0 18
2XKV_B 0.80 0.64 1.00 7 1828 2 0 0 2 4
2XXA_G 0.50 0.26 1.00 9 2036 0 0 0 0 26
3IYQ_A 0.36 0.27 0.48 14 22411 19 13 2 4 37
3IZ4_A 0.46 0.26 0.81 25 25505 8 6 0 2 70
3J20_2 0.85 0.83 0.87 343 421974 104 11 40 53 69
3NPB_A 0.77 0.59 1.00 22 2256 3 0 0 3 15
3O58_3 0.60 0.36 1.00 8 4756 1 0 0 1 14
3PDR_A 0.81 0.66 1.00 33 4807 1 0 0 1 17
3RKF_A 0.74 0.67 0.84 16 847 3 1 2 0 8
3SD1_A 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 1513 3 2 1 0 12
3W3S_B 0.71 0.52 1.00 17 1972 2 0 0 2 16
3ZEX_C 0.49 0.24 1.00 7 5367 2 0 0 2 22
4A1C_2 0.50 0.25 1.00 5 4511 2 0 0 2 15
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 2 0 0 2 8
4ENB_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 466 0 0 0 0 9
4ENC_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 490 0 0 0 0 9
4FRG_B 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 1185 0 0 0 0 7
4FRN_A 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 1827 2 1 1 0 9

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 723
Total TN 509229
Total FP 679
Total FP CONTRA 142
Total FP INCONS 378
Total FP COMP 159
Total FN 409
Total Scores
MCC 0.609
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.664 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.639
Positive Predictive Value 0.582
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 448 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 429 1 0 0 1 0
2KUV_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 420 0 0 0 0 0
2KUW_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 452 1 0 0 1 0
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A 0.91 0.91 0.91 21 740 2 0 2 0 2
2L1F_B 0.91 0.92 0.92 22 767 2 0 2 0 2
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 26 0 6 20 3
2XXA_G 1.00 1.00 1.00 35 2010 1 0 0 1 0
3IYQ_A 0.24 0.33 0.18 17 22345 95 40 38 17 34
3IZ4_A 0.60 0.61 0.59 58 25437 47 16 25 6 37
3J20_2 0.55 0.58 0.53 239 421918 270 31 180 59 173
3NPB_A 0.77 0.73 0.82 27 2245 11 0 6 5 10
3O58_3 0.39 0.50 0.31 11 4728 41 9 16 16 11
3PDR_A 0.93 0.92 0.94 46 4791 5 1 2 2 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
3W3S_B 0.94 0.91 0.97 30 1958 2 0 1 1 3
3ZEX_C 0.28 0.34 0.23 10 5330 46 9 25 12 19
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4482 43 11 18 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 461 7 0 6 1 10
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 8 0 7 1 10
4FRG_B 0.22 0.25 0.23 6 1176 20 7 13 0 18
4FRN_A 0.46 0.46 0.46 13 1820 15 7 8 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.