CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) RNASLOpt
MCC 0.635 > 0.490
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.600 ± 0.207 > 0.522 ± 0.201
Sensitivity 0.464 < 0.474
Positive Predictive Value 0.875 > 0.518
Total TP 98 < 100
Total TN 17750 > 17669
Total FP 22 < 117
Total FP CONTRA 1 < 34
Total FP INCONS 13 < 59
Total FP COMP 8 < 24
Total FN 113 > 111
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and RNASLOpt).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 98
Total TN 17750
Total FP 22
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 13
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 113
Total Scores
MCC 0.635
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.600 ± 0.207
Sensitivity 0.464
Positive Predictive Value 0.875
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 0 12 0 18
3W3S_B 0.71 0.52 1.00 17 1972 2 0 0 2 16
3ZEX_C 0.49 0.24 1.00 7 5367 2 0 0 2 22
4A1C_2 0.50 0.25 1.00 5 4511 2 0 0 2 15
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 2 0 0 2 8
4ENB_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 466 0 0 0 0 9
4ENC_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 490 0 0 0 0 9
4FRG_B 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 1185 0 0 0 0 7
4FRN_A 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 1827 2 1 1 0 9

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 100
Total TN 17669
Total FP 117
Total FP CONTRA 34
Total FP INCONS 59
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 111
Total Scores
MCC 0.490
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.522 ± 0.201
Sensitivity 0.474
Positive Predictive Value 0.518
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.48 0.39 0.64 7 517 4 0 4 0 11
3W3S_B 0.90 0.85 0.97 28 1960 2 0 1 1 5
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.34 0.31 10 5342 36 8 14 14 19
4A1C_2 0.30 0.40 0.24 8 4482 35 13 13 9 12
4AOB_A 0.31 0.28 0.38 8 1416 13 3 10 0 21
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10
4FRN_A 0.19 0.18 0.22 5 1825 18 6 12 0 23

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.