CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAshapes - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAshapes & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAshapes PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.633 > 0.094
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.632 ± 0.110 > 0.039 ± 0.056
Sensitivity 0.638 > 0.019
Positive Predictive Value 0.637 > 0.474
Total TP 298 > 9
Total TN 34312 < 34761
Total FP 223 > 49
Total FP CONTRA 38 > 0
Total FP INCONS 132 > 10
Total FP COMP 53 > 39
Total FN 169 < 458
P-value 2.89169006118e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAshapes and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of performance of RNAshapes and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and PPfold(seed)).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and PPfold(seed)).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAshapes and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and PPfold(seed)).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAshapes and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAshapes - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 298
Total TN 34312
Total FP 223
Total FP CONTRA 38
Total FP INCONS 132
Total FP COMP 53
Total FN 169
Total Scores
MCC 0.633
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.632 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.638
Positive Predictive Value 0.637
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 0 5 0 7
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3J16_L 0.59 0.57 0.63 12 1140 7 0 7 0 9
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 3 10 1 9
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.77 0.79 0.75 27 2984 14 1 8 5 7
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
3UZL_B 0.43 0.50 0.38 8 1272 17 4 9 4 8
3W3S_B 0.60 0.58 0.63 19 1959 12 2 9 1 14
3ZEX_C 0.29 0.34 0.26 10 5335 42 5 24 13 19
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.80 0.93 28 2766 6 0 2 4 7
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 7 0 4 3 6
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.16 5 4484 41 11 16 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10
4FRG_B 0.36 0.38 0.38 9 1178 15 2 13 0 15
4FRN_A 0.59 0.57 0.62 16 1822 10 2 8 0 12

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 9
Total TN 34761
Total FP 49
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 10
Total FP COMP 39
Total FN 458
Total Scores
MCC 0.094
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.039 ± 0.056
Sensitivity 0.019
Positive Predictive Value 0.474
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.33 0.75 6 520 2 0 2 0 12
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1157 0 0 0 0 19
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1159 0 0 0 0 21
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1219 0 0 0 0 21
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1112 0 0 0 0 20
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3020 0 0 0 0 34
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1293 0 0 0 0 16
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1989 0 0 0 0 33
3ZEX_C 0.15 0.07 0.33 2 5368 24 0 4 20 27
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2796 0 0 0 0 35
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2763 0 0 0 0 37
4A1C_2 0.10 0.05 0.20 1 4511 23 0 4 19 19
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1848 0 0 0 0 28

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.