CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAshapes - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAshapes & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAshapes RNASLOpt
MCC 0.618 > 0.580
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.670 ± 0.098 > 0.634 ± 0.104
Sensitivity 0.638 > 0.559
Positive Predictive Value 0.605 < 0.608
Total TP 595 > 522
Total TN 105827 < 105952
Total FP 521 > 429
Total FP CONTRA 106 < 114
Total FP INCONS 282 > 222
Total FP COMP 133 > 93
Total FN 338 < 411
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAshapes and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and RNASLOpt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and RNASLOpt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAshapes and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of RNAshapes - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 595
Total TN 105827
Total FP 521
Total FP CONTRA 106
Total FP INCONS 282
Total FP COMP 133
Total FN 338
Total Scores
MCC 0.618
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.670 ± 0.098
Sensitivity 0.638
Positive Predictive Value 0.605
Nr of predictions 47

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 0 5 0 7
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 29 2411 6 0 0 6 0
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.18 0.22 2 402 8 3 4 1 9
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 507 12 2 10 0 10
3J0L_h - 0.87 0.81 0.93 26 2112 4 1 1 2 6
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 4 0 1 3 3
3J0L_2 - 0.46 0.46 0.48 12 2225 20 1 12 7 14
3J16_L 0.59 0.57 0.63 12 1140 7 0 7 0 9
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 3 10 1 9
3J2C_M - 0.61 0.65 0.58 62 39818 68 17 28 23 34
3J2C_O - 0.43 0.44 0.44 18 3946 27 3 20 4 23
3J2L_3 0.77 0.79 0.75 27 2984 14 1 8 5 7
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3UZL_B 0.43 0.50 0.38 8 1272 17 4 9 4 8
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.60 0.58 0.63 19 1959 12 2 9 1 14
3ZEX_F - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 908 11 2 4 5 4
3ZEX_G - 0.66 0.67 0.67 30 6462 27 4 11 12 15
3ZEX_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 8247 59 20 37 2 34
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.80 0.93 28 2766 6 0 2 4 7
3ZEX_H - 0.28 0.37 0.22 7 3593 32 11 14 7 12
3ZEX_C 0.29 0.34 0.26 10 5335 42 5 24 13 19
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 7 0 4 3 6
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.16 5 4484 41 11 16 14 15
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ATO_G - 0.38 0.43 0.38 3 212 5 5 0 0 4
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10
4FNJ_A - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 240 0 0 0 0 2
4FRG_B 0.36 0.38 0.38 9 1178 15 2 13 0 15
4FRN_A 0.59 0.57 0.62 16 1822 10 2 8 0 12
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 522
Total TN 105952
Total FP 429
Total FP CONTRA 114
Total FP INCONS 222
Total FP COMP 93
Total FN 411
Total Scores
MCC 0.580
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.634 ± 0.104
Sensitivity 0.559
Positive Predictive Value 0.608
Nr of predictions 47

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.48 0.39 0.64 7 517 4 0 4 0 11
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.70 0.69 0.71 20 2412 13 1 7 5 9
2LQZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 124 2 0 0 2 0
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.18 0.29 2 404 6 3 2 1 9
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_h - 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 2119 0 0 0 0 11
3J0L_8 - 0.74 0.57 1.00 4 72 0 0 0 0 3
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 4 0 1 3 5
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.46 0.52 12 2227 18 0 11 7 14
3J16_L 0.63 0.57 0.71 12 1142 5 0 5 0 9
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3J2C_M - 0.46 0.49 0.44 47 39819 77 22 37 18 49
3J2C_O - 0.72 0.68 0.76 28 3950 13 2 7 4 13
3J2L_3 0.71 0.68 0.74 23 2989 11 0 8 3 11
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 2 0 0 2 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3UZL_B 0.55 0.50 0.62 8 1280 9 1 4 4 8
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.90 0.85 0.97 28 1960 2 0 1 1 5
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 914 0 0 0 0 4
3ZEX_G - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6507 0 0 0 0 45
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 8254 55 20 30 5 34
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.74 1.00 26 2770 4 0 0 4 9
3ZEX_H - 0.27 0.37 0.21 7 3592 26 16 10 0 12
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.34 0.31 10 5342 36 8 14 14 19
4A1C_3 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2732 5 0 4 1 10
4A1C_2 0.30 0.40 0.24 8 4482 35 13 13 9 12
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.31 0.28 0.38 8 1416 13 3 10 0 21
4ATO_G - 0.36 0.43 0.33 3 211 6 6 0 0 4
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FNJ_A - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 239 11 0 11 0 12
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10
4FRN_A 0.19 0.18 0.22 5 1825 18 6 12 0 23
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.