CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAsubopt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAsubopt & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAsubopt Cylofold
MCC 0.750 > 0.701
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.771 ± 0.069 > 0.734 ± 0.064
Sensitivity 0.760 > 0.686
Positive Predictive Value 0.748 > 0.725
Total TP 1066 > 962
Total TN 85181 < 85280
Total FP 505 > 465
Total FP CONTRA 83 < 101
Total FP INCONS 276 > 263
Total FP COMP 146 > 101
Total FN 336 < 440
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAsubopt and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Cylofold).

  2. Comparison of performance of RNAsubopt and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Cylofold).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Cylofold).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Cylofold).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAsubopt and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Cylofold).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAsubopt and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of RNAsubopt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAsubopt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1066
Total TN 85181
Total FP 505
Total FP CONTRA 83
Total FP INCONS 276
Total FP COMP 146
Total FN 336
Total Scores
MCC 0.750
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.771 ± 0.069
Sensitivity 0.760
Positive Predictive Value 0.748
Nr of predictions 75

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAsubopt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.62 0.61 0.64 14 2002 15 5 3 7 9
2KX8_A 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 356 0 0 0 0 1
2KXM_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 141 0 0 0 0 0
2KZL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 507 1 0 0 1 0
2L1F_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 22 769 0 0 0 0 2
2L1F_A 0.95 0.91 1.00 21 742 0 0 0 0 2
2L2K_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 17 332 0 0 0 0 0
2L3C_B - 0.96 0.93 1.00 13 226 0 0 0 0 1
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 30 955 0 0 0 0 0
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 3 0 1 2 2
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.85 0.86 0.83 25 2410 14 0 5 9 4
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
2RRC_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 68 0 0 0 0 0
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 25 0 6 19 3
2XQD_Y 0.83 0.81 0.85 17 1109 4 0 3 1 4
2XXA_G 0.49 0.49 0.52 17 2012 17 1 15 1 18
2Y9C_V - 0.79 0.83 0.75 15 886 8 0 5 3 3
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 15 6 9 0 8
2YIE_X - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 537 4 0 0 4 0
3ADB_C - 0.98 0.97 1.00 32 1787 0 0 0 0 1
3AKZ_H 0.43 0.45 0.43 9 1106 14 3 9 2 11
3AM1_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 29 1437 0 0 0 0 0
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3IZF_C 0.89 0.91 0.86 32 2603 9 0 5 4 3
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 507 12 2 10 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 173 5 1 2 2 2
3J0L_a - 0.35 0.36 0.36 4 400 8 3 4 1 7
3J0L_2 - 0.28 0.31 0.28 8 2221 25 2 19 4 18
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 4 0 1 3 3
3J0L_h - 0.87 0.81 0.93 26 2112 4 1 1 2 6
3J16_L 0.49 0.52 0.48 11 1136 12 3 9 0 10
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 3 0 0 3 0
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 2 11 1 9
3J2C_O - 0.66 0.68 0.65 28 3944 20 3 12 5 13
3J2L_3 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2984 13 1 7 5 6
3NDB_M - 0.93 0.93 0.93 41 3670 9 0 3 6 3
3NKB_B - 0.66 0.68 0.65 13 715 7 0 7 0 6
3NMU_E - 1.00 1.00 1.00 3 213 5 0 0 5 0
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 35 6 15 14 11
3O58_2 0.87 0.90 0.85 28 2721 13 0 5 8 3
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 215 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 204 0 0 0 0 0
3P22_G - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 301 0 0 0 0 0
3PDR_A 0.90 0.90 0.90 45 4790 7 2 3 2 5
3R4F_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 22 884 1 0 0 1 0
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
3SIU_F - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 137 0 0 0 0 0
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3UZL_B 0.49 0.50 0.50 8 1277 15 0 8 7 8
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.95 0.94 0.97 31 1957 2 0 1 1 2
3ZEX_D 0.91 0.89 0.94 31 2763 6 0 2 4 4
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 8255 54 17 32 5 34
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.62 0.62 0.64 18 1409 11 4 6 1 11
4ATO_G - 0.36 0.43 0.33 3 211 6 6 0 0 4
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 7 0 7 0 10
4FNJ_A - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 240 0 0 0 0 2
4FRG_B 0.36 0.38 0.38 9 1178 15 2 13 0 15
4FRN_A 0.58 0.57 0.59 16 1821 11 3 8 0 12
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 962
Total TN 85280
Total FP 465
Total FP CONTRA 101
Total FP INCONS 263
Total FP COMP 101
Total FN 440
Total Scores
MCC 0.701
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.734 ± 0.064
Sensitivity 0.686
Positive Predictive Value 0.725
Nr of predictions 75

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.85 0.87 0.83 20 2000 12 4 0 8 3
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2KXM_A - 0.78 0.63 1.00 5 144 0 0 0 0 3
2KZL_A - 0.83 0.69 1.00 9 511 1 0 0 1 4
2L1F_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 770 0 0 0 0 3
2L1F_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 20 743 0 0 0 0 3
2L2K_A - 0.87 0.76 1.00 13 336 0 0 0 0 4
2L3C_B - 0.84 0.71 1.00 10 229 0 0 0 0 4
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 0.95 0.90 1.00 27 958 0 0 0 0 3
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 1 0 1 0 2
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
2LDL_A - 0.81 0.67 1.00 6 134 0 0 0 0 3
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.56 0.55 0.57 16 2412 13 4 8 1 13
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
2RRC_A - 0.83 0.71 1.00 5 70 0 0 0 0 2
2XKV_B 0.41 0.55 0.32 6 1816 25 9 4 12 5
2XQD_Y 0.89 0.95 0.83 20 1105 5 4 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.10 0.11 0.11 4 2009 32 2 30 0 31
2Y9C_V - 0.72 0.72 0.72 13 888 8 0 5 3 5
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 591 11 5 6 0 8
2YIE_X - 0.43 0.57 0.33 4 532 10 2 6 2 3
3ADB_C - 0.84 0.82 0.87 27 1788 4 0 4 0 6
3AKZ_H 0.77 0.75 0.79 15 1108 7 0 4 3 5
3AM1_B - 0.83 0.76 0.92 22 1442 2 0 2 0 7
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3IZF_C 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2607 7 0 4 3 6
3J0L_7 - 0.41 0.50 0.36 5 505 10 3 6 1 5
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_a - 0.17 0.18 0.20 2 401 9 3 5 1 9
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.46 0.52 12 2227 18 0 11 7 14
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J0L_h - 0.55 0.50 0.62 16 2114 10 2 8 0 16
3J16_L 0.90 0.81 1.00 17 1142 0 0 0 0 4
3J20_1 0.71 0.75 0.68 15 1090 8 2 5 1 5
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 3 3 1 5
3J2C_O - 0.51 0.49 0.54 20 3950 19 1 16 2 21
3J2L_3 0.71 0.68 0.74 23 2989 11 0 8 3 11
3NDB_M - 0.68 0.64 0.74 28 3676 14 2 8 4 16
3NKB_B - 0.46 0.42 0.53 8 720 7 0 7 0 11
3NMU_E - 0.28 0.33 0.25 1 212 6 1 2 3 2
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3O58_2 0.90 0.84 0.96 26 2727 3 0 1 2 5
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 215 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 204 0 0 0 0 0
3P22_G - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 301 0 0 0 0 0
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3R4F_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 22 884 1 0 0 1 0
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.63 0.42 1.00 5 149 0 0 0 0 7
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3UZL_B 0.45 0.50 0.42 8 1274 18 4 7 7 8
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.48 0.45 0.52 15 1960 15 1 13 1 18
3ZEX_D 0.69 0.69 0.71 24 2762 11 5 5 1 11
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 8258 51 15 31 5 34
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ATO_G - 0.88 1.00 0.78 7 211 2 2 0 0 0
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FNJ_A - 0.81 0.67 1.00 8 242 0 0 0 0 4
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3
4FRN_A 0.23 0.18 0.31 5 1832 11 7 4 0 23
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 89 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.