CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAsubopt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAsubopt & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAsubopt PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.635 > 0.094
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.615 ± 0.140 > 0.039 ± 0.056
Sensitivity 0.647 > 0.019
Positive Predictive Value 0.633 > 0.474
Total TP 302 > 9
Total TN 34303 < 34761
Total FP 233 > 49
Total FP CONTRA 40 > 0
Total FP INCONS 135 > 10
Total FP COMP 58 > 39
Total FN 165 < 458
P-value 2.71568867205e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAsubopt and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of performance of RNAsubopt and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and PPfold(seed)).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and PPfold(seed)).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAsubopt and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and PPfold(seed)).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAsubopt and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAsubopt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAsubopt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 302
Total TN 34303
Total FP 233
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 135
Total FP COMP 58
Total FN 165
Total Scores
MCC 0.635
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.615 ± 0.140
Sensitivity 0.647
Positive Predictive Value 0.633
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAsubopt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3J16_L 0.49 0.52 0.48 11 1136 12 3 9 0 10
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 2 11 1 9
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 3 0 0 3 0
3J2L_3 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2984 13 1 7 5 6
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
3UZL_B 0.49 0.50 0.50 8 1277 15 0 8 7 8
3W3S_B 0.95 0.94 0.97 31 1957 2 0 1 1 2
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.26 10 5336 43 5 23 15 19
3ZEX_D 0.91 0.89 0.94 31 2763 6 0 2 4 4
4A1C_3 0.85 0.84 0.86 31 2727 8 0 5 3 6
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4481 43 13 17 13 15
4AOB_A 0.62 0.62 0.64 18 1409 11 4 6 1 11
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 7 0 7 0 10
4FRG_B 0.36 0.38 0.38 9 1178 15 2 13 0 15
4FRN_A 0.58 0.57 0.59 16 1821 11 3 8 0 12

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 9
Total TN 34761
Total FP 49
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 10
Total FP COMP 39
Total FN 458
Total Scores
MCC 0.094
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.039 ± 0.056
Sensitivity 0.019
Positive Predictive Value 0.474
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.33 0.75 6 520 2 0 2 0 12
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1157 0 0 0 0 19
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1159 0 0 0 0 21
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1219 0 0 0 0 21
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1112 0 0 0 0 20
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3020 0 0 0 0 34
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1293 0 0 0 0 16
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1989 0 0 0 0 33
3ZEX_C 0.15 0.07 0.33 2 5368 24 0 4 20 27
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2796 0 0 0 0 35
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2763 0 0 0 0 37
4A1C_2 0.10 0.05 0.20 1 4511 23 0 4 19 19
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1848 0 0 0 0 28

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.