CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAwolf - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAwolf & Mastr(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAwolf Mastr(seed)
MCC 0.477 > 0.040
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.497 ± 0.106 > 0.007 ± 0.015
Sensitivity 0.484 > 0.004
Positive Predictive Value 0.482 > 0.375
Total TP 329 > 3
Total TN 54851 < 55525
Total FP 436 > 5
Total FP CONTRA 84 > 0
Total FP INCONS 269 > 5
Total FP COMP 83 > 0
Total FN 351 < 677
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAwolf and Mastr(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and Mastr(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and Mastr(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAwolf and Mastr(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and Mastr(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAwolf - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 329
Total TN 54851
Total FP 436
Total FP CONTRA 84
Total FP INCONS 269
Total FP COMP 83
Total FN 351
Total Scores
MCC 0.477
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.497 ± 0.106
Sensitivity 0.484
Positive Predictive Value 0.482
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 9 512 7 0 7 0 9
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3J16_L 0.58 0.57 0.60 12 1139 9 2 6 1 9
3J20_1 0.53 0.55 0.52 11 1091 11 4 6 1 9
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 2 9 1 9
3J2L_3 0.71 0.71 0.73 24 2987 13 1 8 4 10
3J3D_C 0.92 0.95 0.90 18 948 3 2 0 1 1
3J3E_7 0.57 0.56 0.59 19 2709 15 1 12 2 15
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2719 37 6 17 14 15
3J3F_8 0.28 0.37 0.23 7 4730 39 9 15 15 12
3J3F_7 0.27 0.28 0.28 10 2898 27 4 22 1 26
3J3V_B 0.59 0.59 0.59 16 2629 16 1 10 5 11
3RKF_A 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 845 1 0 1 0 4
3SD1_A 0.58 0.59 0.59 17 1504 12 2 10 0 12
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3W1K_J 0.81 0.77 0.86 24 1650 5 0 4 1 7
3W3S_B 0.70 0.70 0.72 23 1957 10 0 9 1 10
3ZEX_D 0.26 0.26 0.27 9 2763 24 8 16 0 26
3ZEX_C 0.08 0.10 0.07 3 5328 43 18 25 0 26
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 15 0 4 11 2
4A1C_3 0.32 0.30 0.35 11 2732 21 1 19 1 26
4A1C_2 0.12 0.15 0.10 3 4487 38 12 14 12 17
4AOB_A 0.26 0.24 0.30 7 1414 17 2 14 1 22
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 10
4FRG_B 0.54 0.50 0.60 12 1182 8 3 5 0 12
4FRN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1828 20 1 19 0 28
4JF2_A 0.72 0.67 0.80 16 1062 4 4 0 0 8

^top



Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 3
Total TN 55525
Total FP 5
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 5
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 677
Total Scores
MCC 0.040
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.007 ± 0.015
Sensitivity 0.004
Positive Predictive Value 0.375
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 528 0 0 0 0 18
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1157 0 0 0 0 19
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1159 0 0 0 0 21
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1112 0 0 0 0 20
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1219 0 0 0 0 21
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3020 0 0 0 0 34
3J3D_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 968 0 0 0 0 19
3J3E_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2741 0 0 0 0 34
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2742 0 0 0 0 15
3J3F_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4761 0 0 0 0 19
3J3F_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2934 0 0 0 0 36
3J3V_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2656 0 0 0 0 27
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1293 0 0 0 0 16
3W1K_J 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1678 0 0 0 0 31
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1989 0 0 0 0 33
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2796 0 0 0 0 35
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5374 0 0 0 0 29
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1191 0 0 0 0 8
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2763 0 0 0 0 37
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1848 0 0 0 0 28
4JF2_A 0.21 0.13 0.38 3 1074 5 0 5 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.