CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAwolf - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAwolf & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAwolf RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.507 > 0.478
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.496 ± 0.105 > 0.140 ± 0.098
Sensitivity 0.508 > 0.346
Positive Predictive Value 0.508 < 0.662
Total TP 541 > 369
Total TN 474181 < 474688
Total FP 663 > 256
Total FP CONTRA 110 > 35
Total FP INCONS 413 > 153
Total FP COMP 140 > 68
Total FN 524 < 696
P-value 5.6410608252e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAwolf and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAwolf and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAwolf - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 541
Total TN 474181
Total FP 663
Total FP CONTRA 110
Total FP INCONS 413
Total FP COMP 140
Total FN 524
Total Scores
MCC 0.507
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.496 ± 0.105
Sensitivity 0.508
Positive Predictive Value 0.508
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 9 512 7 0 7 0 9
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3J16_L 0.58 0.57 0.60 12 1139 9 2 6 1 9
3J20_1 0.53 0.55 0.52 11 1091 11 4 6 1 9
3J20_2 0.55 0.55 0.56 228 421959 243 27 154 62 184
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 2 9 1 9
3J2L_3 0.71 0.71 0.73 24 2987 13 1 8 4 10
3J3D_C 0.92 0.95 0.90 18 948 3 2 0 1 1
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2719 37 6 17 14 15
3J3E_7 0.57 0.56 0.59 19 2709 15 1 12 2 15
3J3F_7 0.27 0.28 0.28 10 2898 27 4 22 1 26
3J3F_8 0.28 0.37 0.23 7 4730 39 9 15 15 12
3RKF_A 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 845 1 0 1 0 4
3SD1_A 0.58 0.59 0.59 17 1504 12 2 10 0 12
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3W1K_J 0.81 0.77 0.86 24 1650 5 0 4 1 7
3W3S_B 0.70 0.70 0.72 23 1957 10 0 9 1 10
3ZEX_C 0.08 0.10 0.07 3 5328 43 18 25 0 26
3ZEX_D 0.26 0.26 0.27 9 2763 24 8 16 0 26
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 15 0 4 11 2
4A1C_3 0.32 0.30 0.35 11 2732 21 1 19 1 26
4A1C_2 0.12 0.15 0.10 3 4487 38 12 14 12 17
4AOB_A 0.26 0.24 0.30 7 1414 17 2 14 1 22
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 10
4FRG_B 0.54 0.50 0.60 12 1182 8 3 5 0 12
4FRN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1828 20 1 19 0 28
4JF2_A 0.72 0.67 0.80 16 1062 4 4 0 0 8

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 369
Total TN 474688
Total FP 256
Total FP CONTRA 35
Total FP INCONS 153
Total FP COMP 68
Total FN 696
Total Scores
MCC 0.478
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.140 ± 0.098
Sensitivity 0.346
Positive Predictive Value 0.662
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
3AMU_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1155 2 0 2 0 19
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1158 1 0 1 0 21
3J20_1 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1108 5 0 4 1 20
3J20_2 0.77 0.76 0.78 312 421966 152 18 72 62 100
3J20_0 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1215 4 0 4 0 21
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3015 5 0 5 0 34
3J3D_C -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 964 4 1 3 0 19
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2742 0 0 0 0 15
3J3E_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2733 8 1 7 0 34
3J3F_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2930 4 1 3 0 36
3J3F_8 0.19 0.11 0.33 2 4755 5 3 1 1 17
3RKF_A 0.84 0.75 0.95 18 847 1 1 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3UZL_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1287 6 3 3 0 16
3W1K_J 0.57 0.35 0.92 11 1666 1 0 1 0 20
3W3S_B 0.45 0.36 0.57 12 1968 10 1 8 1 21
3ZEX_C 0.13 0.07 0.25 2 5366 6 2 4 0 27
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2794 2 0 2 0 35
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1189 4 0 2 2 8
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2759 4 2 2 0 37
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4512 5 2 2 1 20
4AOB_A 0.42 0.21 0.86 6 1430 1 0 1 0 23
4ENB_A 0.34 0.20 0.60 3 467 2 0 2 0 12
4ENC_A 0.34 0.20 0.60 3 491 2 0 2 0 12
4FRG_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1200 2 0 2 0 24
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1845 3 0 3 0 28
4JF2_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1078 4 0 4 0 24

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.