CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAwolf - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAwolf & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAwolf Vsfold5
MCC 0.518 > 0.505
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.572 ± 0.092 < 0.579 ± 0.093
Sensitivity 0.524 > 0.518
Positive Predictive Value 0.526 > 0.506
Total TP 556 > 550
Total TN 74826 > 74796
Total FP 623 < 632
Total FP CONTRA 120 < 159
Total FP INCONS 381 > 378
Total FP COMP 122 > 95
Total FN 505 < 511
P-value 3.26115971074e-07

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAwolf and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and Vsfold5).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and Vsfold5).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAwolf and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of RNAwolf - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 556
Total TN 74826
Total FP 623
Total FP CONTRA 120
Total FP INCONS 381
Total FP COMP 122
Total FN 505
Total Scores
MCC 0.518
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.572 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.524
Positive Predictive Value 0.526
Nr of predictions 58

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 9 512 7 0 7 0 9
2LDL_A - 0.88 0.78 1.00 7 133 0 0 0 0 2
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 1 0 0 1 0
2LI4_A - 0.96 0.93 1.00 13 176 0 0 0 0 1
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.84 0.79 0.88 23 2414 11 0 3 8 6
2LU0_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 423 0 0 0 0 1
2LWK_A - 0.48 0.45 0.56 5 198 5 0 4 1 6
2M58_A - 0.60 0.58 0.64 7 533 4 1 3 0 5
2YIE_X - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 536 11 1 7 3 7
2YIE_Z - 0.62 0.63 0.63 5 594 7 1 2 4 3
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3J0L_h - 0.47 0.41 0.57 13 2117 12 1 9 2 19
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.14 2 397 13 4 8 1 9
3J0L_1 - 0.68 0.54 0.88 7 476 5 0 1 4 6
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 509 10 1 9 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 171 7 4 1 2 2
3J0L_2 - 0.14 0.15 0.15 4 2223 26 4 19 3 22
3J16_L 0.58 0.57 0.60 12 1139 9 2 6 1 9
3J20_1 0.53 0.55 0.52 11 1091 11 4 6 1 9
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 2 9 1 9
3J2C_O - 0.41 0.44 0.40 18 3942 30 7 20 3 23
3J2L_3 0.71 0.71 0.73 24 2987 13 1 8 4 10
3J3D_C 0.92 0.95 0.90 18 948 3 2 0 1 1
3J3E_7 0.57 0.56 0.59 19 2709 15 1 12 2 15
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2719 37 6 17 14 15
3J3F_7 0.27 0.28 0.28 10 2898 27 4 22 1 26
3J3F_8 0.28 0.37 0.23 7 4730 39 9 15 15 12
3J3V_B 0.59 0.59 0.59 16 2629 16 1 10 5 11
3RKF_A 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 845 1 0 1 0 4
3SD1_A 0.58 0.59 0.59 17 1504 12 2 10 0 12
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 142 0 0 0 0 0
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 103 6 0 5 1 5
3U4M_B - 0.50 0.50 0.52 11 1255 12 1 9 2 11
3UZL_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 1279 7 0 0 7 2
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 1 0 0 1 0
3W3S_B 0.70 0.70 0.72 23 1957 10 0 9 1 10
3ZEX_D 0.26 0.26 0.27 9 2763 24 8 16 0 26
3ZEX_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 8244 60 23 37 0 34
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 15 0 4 11 2
4A1C_3 0.32 0.30 0.35 11 2732 21 1 19 1 26
4A1C_2 0.12 0.15 0.10 3 4487 38 12 14 12 17
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.26 0.24 0.30 7 1414 17 2 14 1 22
4ATO_G - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 213 7 4 3 0 7
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 10
4FRG_B 0.54 0.50 0.60 12 1182 8 3 5 0 12
4FRN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1828 20 1 19 0 28
4JF2_A 0.72 0.67 0.80 16 1062 4 4 0 0 8
4JRC_A - 0.71 0.65 0.79 11 608 3 2 1 0 6

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 550
Total TN 74796
Total FP 632
Total FP CONTRA 159
Total FP INCONS 378
Total FP COMP 95
Total FN 511
Total Scores
MCC 0.505
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.579 ± 0.093
Sensitivity 0.518
Positive Predictive Value 0.506
Nr of predictions 58

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
2LDL_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 132 1 0 0 1 1
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 246 0 0 0 0 0
2LI4_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 175 0 0 0 0 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 123 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 92 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.31 0.31 0.32 9 2412 19 5 14 0 20
2LU0_A - 0.68 0.63 0.77 10 425 3 0 3 0 6
2LWK_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 197 1 0 0 1 1
2M58_A - 0.37 0.33 0.44 4 535 5 4 1 0 8
2YIE_X - 0.43 0.57 0.33 4 532 10 2 6 2 3
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 591 11 5 6 0 8
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3J0L_h - 0.20 0.19 0.24 6 2115 19 3 16 0 26
3J0L_8 - 0.74 0.57 1.00 4 72 0 0 0 0 3
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 4 1 1 7
3J0L_1 - 0.25 0.23 0.30 3 474 8 3 4 1 10
3J0L_7 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 506 13 3 10 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J0L_2 - 0.42 0.42 0.44 11 2225 21 1 13 7 15
3J16_L 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1139 0 0 0 0 1
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 7 0 5 2 5
3J20_0 0.76 0.76 0.76 16 1198 6 3 2 1 5
3J2C_O - 0.33 0.32 0.36 13 3951 26 3 20 3 28
3J2L_3 0.70 0.71 0.71 24 2986 13 3 7 3 10
3J3D_C 0.63 0.68 0.59 13 946 9 3 6 0 6
3J3E_7 0.60 0.59 0.63 20 2709 13 1 11 1 14
3J3E_8 0.10 0.13 0.08 2 2718 31 10 12 9 13
3J3F_7 0.25 0.25 0.26 9 2900 25 4 21 0 27
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.27 9 4728 38 13 11 14 10
3J3V_B 0.18 0.19 0.19 5 2629 28 7 15 6 22
3RKF_A 0.90 0.92 0.88 22 841 3 3 0 0 2
3SD1_A 0.13 0.14 0.15 4 1507 22 5 17 0 25
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
3UZL_B 0.24 0.31 0.20 5 1268 20 9 11 0 11
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 239 0 0 0 0 0
3W3S_B 0.83 0.85 0.82 28 1955 7 2 4 1 5
3ZEX_D 0.09 0.09 0.12 3 2771 24 5 17 2 32
3ZEX_E - 0.11 0.15 0.09 5 8247 54 21 31 2 29
3ZND_W 0.58 0.75 0.46 6 1178 17 4 3 10 2
4A1C_3 0.29 0.30 0.31 11 2727 26 4 21 1 26
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.28 8 4487 37 8 13 16 12
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.21 0.21 0.25 6 1413 19 2 16 1 23
4ATO_G - 0.67 0.86 0.55 6 209 5 5 0 0 1
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10
4FRN_A 0.15 0.14 0.17 4 1825 19 3 16 0 24
4JF2_A 0.96 1.00 0.92 24 1056 2 2 0 0 0
4JRC_A - 0.28 0.29 0.31 5 606 11 2 9 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.