CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RSpredict(20) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RSpredict(20) Afold
MCC 0.663 > 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.670 ± 0.149 > 0.662 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.622 < 0.647
Positive Predictive Value 0.712 > 0.601
Total TP 322 < 335
Total TN 63850 > 63745
Total FP 219 < 354
Total FP CONTRA 57 < 68
Total FP INCONS 73 < 154
Total FP COMP 89 < 132
Total FN 196 > 183
P-value 9.11938533333e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RSpredict(20) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RSpredict(20) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and Afold).

^top





Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 322
Total TN 63850
Total FP 219
Total FP CONTRA 57
Total FP INCONS 73
Total FP COMP 89
Total FN 196
Total Scores
MCC 0.663
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.670 ± 0.149
Sensitivity 0.622
Positive Predictive Value 0.712
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 166 0 0 0 0 2
2L94_A 0.53 0.50 0.60 9 342 7 0 6 1 9
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 12 0 0 12 0
2XXA_G 0.50 0.26 1.00 9 2036 0 0 0 0 26
3A2K_C 0.88 0.86 0.90 19 1087 2 0 2 0 3
3IVN_B 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 882 1 1 0 0 3
3IZ4_A 0.61 0.57 0.67 54 25455 38 13 14 11 41
3IZF_C 0.94 0.91 0.97 32 2607 4 0 1 3 3
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2724 19 5 13 1 15
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3JYX_3 0.80 0.80 0.80 12 2363 16 0 3 13 3
3JYX_4 0.59 0.75 0.47 9 4737 33 9 1 23 3
3LA5_A 0.89 0.80 1.00 20 934 0 0 0 0 5
3NPB_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2272 6 1 5 0 37
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 10 0 2 8 2
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.30 11 4727 29 15 11 3 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 1 0 0 3
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 7 0 2 5 6
4A1C_2 0.25 0.30 0.21 6 4487 30 12 11 7 14
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 335
Total TN 63745
Total FP 354
Total FP CONTRA 68
Total FP INCONS 154
Total FP COMP 132
Total FN 183
Total Scores
MCC 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.662 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.647
Positive Predictive Value 0.601
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 14 0 0 14 0
2XXA_G 0.35 0.34 0.38 12 2013 21 1 19 1 23
3A2K_C 0.46 0.50 0.44 11 1083 14 3 11 0 11
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.57 0.48 54 25423 63 27 32 4 41
3IZF_C 0.83 0.86 0.81 30 2603 11 0 7 4 5
3J3E_8 0.26 0.33 0.21 5 2718 31 6 13 12 10
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1088 23 4 19 0 20
3JYX_3 0.64 0.67 0.63 10 2362 29 0 6 23 5
3JYX_4 0.61 0.83 0.45 10 4734 35 10 2 23 2
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.82 0.73 0.93 27 2249 6 0 2 4 10
3O58_2 0.80 0.81 0.81 25 2723 14 0 6 8 6
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3ZEX_D 0.82 0.77 0.87 27 2765 8 0 4 4 8
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.