CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RSpredict(20) & CMfinder(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RSpredict(20) CMfinder(20)
MCC 0.688 > 0.660
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.615 ± 0.235 < 0.635 ± 0.153
Sensitivity 0.653 > 0.580
Positive Predictive Value 0.731 < 0.759
Total TP 160 > 142
Total TN 23355 < 23387
Total FP 90 > 65
Total FP CONTRA 20 > 15
Total FP INCONS 39 > 30
Total FP COMP 31 > 20
Total FN 85 < 103
P-value 6.62909925123e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RSpredict(20) and CMfinder(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and CMfinder(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and CMfinder(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RSpredict(20) and CMfinder(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and CMfinder(20)).

^top





Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 160
Total TN 23355
Total FP 90
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 39
Total FP COMP 31
Total FN 85
Total Scores
MCC 0.688
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.615 ± 0.235
Sensitivity 0.653
Positive Predictive Value 0.731
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 1198 3 1 1 1 2
3J2L_3 0.71 0.59 0.87 20 2997 6 0 3 3 14
3J3D_C 0.82 0.84 0.80 16 948 4 3 1 0 3
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2724 19 5 13 1 15
3J3E_7 0.82 0.79 0.84 27 2709 7 0 5 2 7
3J3F_8 0.42 0.47 0.38 9 4737 26 9 6 11 10
3J3F_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 2898 3 1 1 1 2
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 7 0 2 5 6
3ZND_W 0.47 0.38 0.60 3 1186 9 0 2 7 5
4FRG_B 0.19 0.13 0.33 3 1193 6 1 5 0 21

^top



Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 142
Total TN 23387
Total FP 65
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 30
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 103
Total Scores
MCC 0.660
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.635 ± 0.153
Sensitivity 0.580
Positive Predictive Value 0.759
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.84 0.76 0.94 16 1202 2 1 0 1 5
3J2L_3 0.57 0.50 0.65 17 2994 11 2 7 2 17
3J3D_C 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 950 3 3 0 0 4
3J3E_8 0.14 0.13 0.17 2 2730 10 3 7 0 13
3J3E_7 0.81 0.74 0.89 25 2713 5 0 3 2 9
3J3F_8 0.48 0.47 0.50 9 4743 11 5 4 2 10
3J3F_7 0.79 0.72 0.87 26 2904 6 1 3 2 10
3ZEX_D 0.70 0.54 0.90 19 2775 3 0 2 1 16
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 14 0 4 10 2
4FRG_B 0.54 0.29 1.00 7 1195 0 0 0 0 17

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.