CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RSpredict(20) & Contrafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RSpredict(20) Contrafold
MCC 0.660 > 0.650
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.636 ± 0.095 < 0.653 ± 0.093
Sensitivity 0.597 < 0.676
Positive Predictive Value 0.735 > 0.632
Total TP 598 < 677
Total TN 104649 > 104392
Total FP 341 < 574
Total FP CONTRA 84 < 133
Total FP INCONS 132 < 261
Total FP COMP 125 < 180
Total FN 403 > 324
P-value 0.000108348164592

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RSpredict(20) and Contrafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and Contrafold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and Contrafold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RSpredict(20) and Contrafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and Contrafold).

^top





Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 598
Total TN 104649
Total FP 341
Total FP CONTRA 84
Total FP INCONS 132
Total FP COMP 125
Total FN 403
Total Scores
MCC 0.660
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.636 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.597
Positive Predictive Value 0.735
Nr of predictions 39

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 166 0 0 0 0 2
2L94_A 0.53 0.50 0.60 9 342 7 0 6 1 9
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 12 0 0 12 0
2XKV_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1831 4 1 3 0 11
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.50 0.26 1.00 9 2036 0 0 0 0 26
3A2K_C 0.88 0.86 0.90 19 1087 2 0 2 0 3
3AMU_B 0.69 0.53 0.91 10 1146 2 0 1 1 9
3GX2_A 0.40 0.21 0.75 6 1441 2 1 1 0 22
3IVN_B 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 882 1 1 0 0 3
3IZ4_A 0.61 0.57 0.67 54 25455 38 13 14 11 41
3IZF_C 0.94 0.91 0.97 32 2607 4 0 1 3 3
3J20_0 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 1198 3 1 1 1 2
3J20_1 0.67 0.50 0.91 10 1101 2 0 1 1 10
3J2L_3 0.71 0.59 0.87 20 2997 6 0 3 3 14
3J3D_C 0.82 0.84 0.80 16 948 4 3 1 0 3
3J3E_7 0.82 0.79 0.84 27 2709 7 0 5 2 7
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2724 19 5 13 1 15
3J3F_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 2898 3 1 1 1 2
3J3F_8 0.42 0.47 0.38 9 4737 26 9 6 11 10
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3JYX_4 0.59 0.75 0.47 9 4737 33 9 1 23 3
3JYX_3 0.80 0.80 0.80 12 2363 16 0 3 13 3
3LA5_A 0.89 0.80 1.00 20 934 0 0 0 0 5
3NPB_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2272 6 1 5 0 37
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.30 11 4727 29 15 11 3 11
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 10 0 2 8 2
3PDR_A 0.80 0.70 0.92 35 4802 5 1 2 2 15
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 1 0 0 3
3SD1_A 0.82 0.86 0.78 25 1501 7 5 2 0 4
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 7 0 2 5 6
3ZEX_C 0.34 0.31 0.38 9 5350 19 3 12 4 20
3ZND_W 0.47 0.38 0.60 3 1186 9 0 2 7 5
4A1C_3 0.60 0.49 0.75 18 2739 8 0 6 2 19
4A1C_2 0.25 0.30 0.21 6 4487 30 12 11 7 14
4AOB_A 0.33 0.21 0.55 6 1426 5 1 4 0 23
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.51 0.40 0.67 6 487 3 0 3 0 9
4FRG_B 0.19 0.13 0.33 3 1193 6 1 5 0 21

^top



Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 677
Total TN 104392
Total FP 574
Total FP CONTRA 133
Total FP INCONS 261
Total FP COMP 180
Total FN 324
Total Scores
MCC 0.650
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.653 ± 0.093
Sensitivity 0.676
Positive Predictive Value 0.632
Nr of predictions 39

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 14 0 0 14 0
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 27 0 6 21 3
2XQD_Y 0.85 0.86 0.86 18 1108 4 0 3 1 3
2XXA_G 0.10 0.11 0.12 4 2012 30 2 27 1 31
3A2K_C 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1082 14 3 11 0 10
3AMU_B 0.75 0.79 0.71 15 1136 9 0 6 3 4
3GX2_A 0.93 0.89 0.96 25 1423 2 1 0 1 3
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.57 0.58 0.57 55 25440 49 18 23 8 40
3IZF_C 0.89 0.91 0.86 32 2603 11 0 5 6 3
3J20_0 0.53 0.57 0.50 12 1195 13 3 9 1 9
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 5 0 0 5 0
3J2L_3 0.74 0.76 0.72 26 2984 16 1 9 6 8
3J3D_C 0.71 0.79 0.65 15 945 8 3 5 0 4
3J3E_7 0.58 0.59 0.59 20 2707 16 2 12 2 14
3J3E_8 0.12 0.13 0.11 2 2724 32 5 11 16 13
3J3F_7 0.84 0.86 0.82 31 2896 11 1 6 4 5
3J3F_8 0.35 0.47 0.26 9 4726 44 13 13 18 10
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1091 20 4 16 0 20
3JYX_4 0.39 0.58 0.27 7 4730 35 13 6 16 5
3JYX_3 0.33 0.47 0.24 7 2349 24 16 6 2 8
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2243 9 1 3 5 6
3O58_3 0.32 0.36 0.29 8 4736 21 7 13 1 14
3O58_2 0.92 0.94 0.91 29 2722 10 0 3 7 2
3PDR_A 0.83 0.86 0.80 43 4786 13 5 6 2 7
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 5 4 0 9
3ZEX_D 0.87 0.86 0.88 30 2762 11 0 4 7 5
3ZEX_C 0.35 0.34 0.37 10 5347 23 4 13 6 19
3ZND_W 0.22 0.38 0.14 3 1170 27 9 9 9 5
4A1C_3 0.81 0.81 0.81 30 2726 10 0 7 3 7
4A1C_2 0.21 0.25 0.19 5 4489 33 9 13 11 15
4AOB_A 0.53 0.52 0.56 15 1410 13 3 9 1 14
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4
4FRG_B 0.73 0.71 0.77 17 1180 5 3 2 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.