CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RSpredict(20) & RNAsubopt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RSpredict(20) RNAsubopt
MCC 0.660 > 0.660
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.636 ± 0.095 < 0.660 ± 0.089
Sensitivity 0.597 < 0.693
Positive Predictive Value 0.735 > 0.634
Total TP 598 < 694
Total TN 104649 > 104368
Total FP 341 < 601
Total FP CONTRA 84 < 134
Total FP INCONS 132 < 267
Total FP COMP 125 < 200
Total FN 403 > 307
P-value 0.686772471119

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RSpredict(20) and RNAsubopt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and RNAsubopt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and RNAsubopt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RSpredict(20) and RNAsubopt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and RNAsubopt).

^top





Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 598
Total TN 104649
Total FP 341
Total FP CONTRA 84
Total FP INCONS 132
Total FP COMP 125
Total FN 403
Total Scores
MCC 0.660
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.636 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.597
Positive Predictive Value 0.735
Nr of predictions 39

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 166 0 0 0 0 2
2L94_A 0.53 0.50 0.60 9 342 7 0 6 1 9
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 12 0 0 12 0
2XKV_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1831 4 1 3 0 11
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.50 0.26 1.00 9 2036 0 0 0 0 26
3A2K_C 0.88 0.86 0.90 19 1087 2 0 2 0 3
3AMU_B 0.69 0.53 0.91 10 1146 2 0 1 1 9
3GX2_A 0.40 0.21 0.75 6 1441 2 1 1 0 22
3IVN_B 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 882 1 1 0 0 3
3IZ4_A 0.61 0.57 0.67 54 25455 38 13 14 11 41
3IZF_C 0.94 0.91 0.97 32 2607 4 0 1 3 3
3J20_0 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 1198 3 1 1 1 2
3J20_1 0.67 0.50 0.91 10 1101 2 0 1 1 10
3J2L_3 0.71 0.59 0.87 20 2997 6 0 3 3 14
3J3D_C 0.82 0.84 0.80 16 948 4 3 1 0 3
3J3E_7 0.82 0.79 0.84 27 2709 7 0 5 2 7
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2724 19 5 13 1 15
3J3F_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 2898 3 1 1 1 2
3J3F_8 0.42 0.47 0.38 9 4737 26 9 6 11 10
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3JYX_4 0.59 0.75 0.47 9 4737 33 9 1 23 3
3JYX_3 0.80 0.80 0.80 12 2363 16 0 3 13 3
3LA5_A 0.89 0.80 1.00 20 934 0 0 0 0 5
3NPB_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2272 6 1 5 0 37
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.30 11 4727 29 15 11 3 11
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 10 0 2 8 2
3PDR_A 0.80 0.70 0.92 35 4802 5 1 2 2 15
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 1 0 0 3
3SD1_A 0.82 0.86 0.78 25 1501 7 5 2 0 4
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 7 0 2 5 6
3ZEX_C 0.34 0.31 0.38 9 5350 19 3 12 4 20
3ZND_W 0.47 0.38 0.60 3 1186 9 0 2 7 5
4A1C_3 0.60 0.49 0.75 18 2739 8 0 6 2 19
4A1C_2 0.25 0.30 0.21 6 4487 30 12 11 7 14
4AOB_A 0.33 0.21 0.55 6 1426 5 1 4 0 23
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.51 0.40 0.67 6 487 3 0 3 0 9
4FRG_B 0.19 0.13 0.33 3 1193 6 1 5 0 21

^top



Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAsubopt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 694
Total TN 104368
Total FP 601
Total FP CONTRA 134
Total FP INCONS 267
Total FP COMP 200
Total FN 307
Total Scores
MCC 0.660
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.660 ± 0.089
Sensitivity 0.693
Positive Predictive Value 0.634
Nr of predictions 39

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAsubopt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 13 0 0 13 0
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 25 0 6 19 3
2XQD_Y 0.83 0.81 0.85 17 1109 4 0 3 1 4
2XXA_G 0.49 0.49 0.52 17 2012 17 1 15 1 18
3A2K_C 0.47 0.50 0.46 11 1084 13 3 10 0 11
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3GX2_A 0.53 0.54 0.54 15 1421 14 4 9 1 13
3IVN_B 0.88 0.78 1.00 18 885 0 0 0 0 5
3IZ4_A 0.56 0.60 0.53 57 25429 54 26 24 4 38
3IZF_C 0.89 0.91 0.86 32 2603 9 0 5 4 3
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 2 11 1 9
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 3 0 0 3 0
3J2L_3 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2984 13 1 7 5 6
3J3D_C 0.65 0.74 0.58 14 944 10 5 5 0 5
3J3E_7 0.79 0.79 0.79 27 2707 12 2 5 5 7
3J3E_8 0.25 0.33 0.20 5 2717 32 7 13 12 10
3J3F_7 0.96 0.97 0.95 35 2897 4 1 1 2 1
3J3F_8 0.35 0.47 0.26 9 4726 42 13 13 16 10
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1090 21 4 17 0 20
3JYX_4 0.34 0.58 0.21 7 4722 38 20 7 11 5
3JYX_3 0.77 0.80 0.75 12 2362 26 0 4 22 3
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.84 0.78 0.91 29 2246 8 0 3 5 8
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 35 6 15 14 11
3O58_2 0.87 0.90 0.85 28 2721 13 0 5 8 3
3PDR_A 0.90 0.90 0.90 45 4790 7 2 3 2 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
3ZEX_D 0.91 0.89 0.94 31 2763 6 0 2 4 4
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.26 10 5336 43 5 23 15 19
3ZND_W 0.24 0.38 0.16 3 1172 25 9 7 9 5
4A1C_3 0.85 0.84 0.86 31 2727 8 0 5 3 6
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4481 43 13 17 13 15
4AOB_A 0.62 0.62 0.64 18 1409 11 4 6 1 11
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 7 0 7 0 10
4FRG_B 0.36 0.38 0.38 9 1178 15 2 13 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.