CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RSpredict(20) & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RSpredict(20) UNAFold
MCC 0.660 > 0.659
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.636 ± 0.095 < 0.657 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.597 < 0.679
Positive Predictive Value 0.735 > 0.646
Total TP 598 < 680
Total TN 104649 > 104411
Total FP 341 < 583
Total FP CONTRA 84 < 103
Total FP INCONS 132 < 269
Total FP COMP 125 < 211
Total FN 403 > 321
P-value 0.788063625903

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RSpredict(20) and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RSpredict(20) and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 598
Total TN 104649
Total FP 341
Total FP CONTRA 84
Total FP INCONS 132
Total FP COMP 125
Total FN 403
Total Scores
MCC 0.660
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.636 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.597
Positive Predictive Value 0.735
Nr of predictions 39

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 166 0 0 0 0 2
2L94_A 0.53 0.50 0.60 9 342 7 0 6 1 9
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 12 0 0 12 0
2XKV_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1831 4 1 3 0 11
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.50 0.26 1.00 9 2036 0 0 0 0 26
3A2K_C 0.88 0.86 0.90 19 1087 2 0 2 0 3
3AMU_B 0.69 0.53 0.91 10 1146 2 0 1 1 9
3GX2_A 0.40 0.21 0.75 6 1441 2 1 1 0 22
3IVN_B 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 882 1 1 0 0 3
3IZ4_A 0.61 0.57 0.67 54 25455 38 13 14 11 41
3IZF_C 0.94 0.91 0.97 32 2607 4 0 1 3 3
3J20_0 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 1198 3 1 1 1 2
3J20_1 0.67 0.50 0.91 10 1101 2 0 1 1 10
3J2L_3 0.71 0.59 0.87 20 2997 6 0 3 3 14
3J3D_C 0.82 0.84 0.80 16 948 4 3 1 0 3
3J3E_7 0.82 0.79 0.84 27 2709 7 0 5 2 7
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2724 19 5 13 1 15
3J3F_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 2898 3 1 1 1 2
3J3F_8 0.42 0.47 0.38 9 4737 26 9 6 11 10
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3JYX_4 0.59 0.75 0.47 9 4737 33 9 1 23 3
3JYX_3 0.80 0.80 0.80 12 2363 16 0 3 13 3
3LA5_A 0.89 0.80 1.00 20 934 0 0 0 0 5
3NPB_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2272 6 1 5 0 37
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.30 11 4727 29 15 11 3 11
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 10 0 2 8 2
3PDR_A 0.80 0.70 0.92 35 4802 5 1 2 2 15
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 1 0 0 3
3SD1_A 0.82 0.86 0.78 25 1501 7 5 2 0 4
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 7 0 2 5 6
3ZEX_C 0.34 0.31 0.38 9 5350 19 3 12 4 20
3ZND_W 0.47 0.38 0.60 3 1186 9 0 2 7 5
4A1C_3 0.60 0.49 0.75 18 2739 8 0 6 2 19
4A1C_2 0.25 0.30 0.21 6 4487 30 12 11 7 14
4AOB_A 0.33 0.21 0.55 6 1426 5 1 4 0 23
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.51 0.40 0.67 6 487 3 0 3 0 9
4FRG_B 0.19 0.13 0.33 3 1193 6 1 5 0 21

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 680
Total TN 104411
Total FP 583
Total FP CONTRA 103
Total FP INCONS 269
Total FP COMP 211
Total FN 321
Total Scores
MCC 0.659
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.657 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.679
Positive Predictive Value 0.646
Nr of predictions 39

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 14 0 0 14 0
2XKV_B 0.58 0.64 0.54 7 1822 23 0 6 17 4
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.35 0.34 0.38 12 2013 21 1 19 1 23
3A2K_C 0.47 0.50 0.46 11 1084 13 3 10 0 11
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3GX2_A 0.81 0.79 0.85 22 1423 5 2 2 1 6
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.58 0.60 0.57 57 25436 53 12 31 10 38
3IZF_C 0.89 0.91 0.86 32 2603 9 0 5 4 3
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 3 10 1 9
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 6 0 5 1 5
3J2L_3 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2984 12 1 7 4 6
3J3D_C 0.33 0.37 0.32 7 946 15 3 12 0 12
3J3E_7 0.58 0.59 0.59 20 2707 16 2 12 2 14
3J3E_8 0.15 0.20 0.13 3 2718 32 6 15 11 12
3J3F_7 0.86 0.86 0.86 31 2898 6 1 4 1 5
3J3F_8 0.32 0.42 0.25 8 4729 44 12 12 20 11
3JYV_7 0.24 0.25 0.25 5 1091 16 7 8 1 15
3JYX_4 0.61 0.83 0.45 10 4734 31 10 2 19 2
3JYX_3 0.77 0.80 0.75 12 2362 27 0 4 23 3
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.85 0.78 0.94 29 2247 6 0 2 4 8
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 34 5 15 14 11
3O58_2 0.87 0.87 0.87 27 2723 12 0 4 8 4
3PDR_A 0.93 0.92 0.94 46 4791 5 1 2 2 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 6 0 2 4 6
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.26 10 5336 43 5 23 15 19
3ZND_W 0.25 0.38 0.18 3 1174 22 8 6 8 5
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 42 11 17 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10
4FRG_B 0.36 0.38 0.38 9 1178 15 2 13 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.