CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RSpredict(seed) & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RSpredict(seed) PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.175 > 0.157
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.116 ± 0.089 > 0.062 ± 0.069
Sensitivity 0.087 > 0.040
Positive Predictive Value 0.368 < 0.634
Total TP 57 > 26
Total TN 52722 < 52836
Total FP 104 > 80
Total FP CONTRA 17 > 1
Total FP INCONS 81 > 14
Total FP COMP 6 < 65
Total FN 596 < 627
P-value 0.000114483813978

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RSpredict(seed) and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(seed) and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(seed) and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RSpredict(seed) and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(seed) and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 57
Total TN 52722
Total FP 104
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 81
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 596
Total Scores
MCC 0.175
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.116 ± 0.089
Sensitivity 0.087
Positive Predictive Value 0.368
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
3AMU_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1155 2 0 2 0 19
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1158 1 0 1 0 21
3J20_1 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1108 5 0 4 1 20
3J20_0 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1215 4 0 4 0 21
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3015 5 0 5 0 34
3J3D_C -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 964 4 1 3 0 19
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2742 0 0 0 0 15
3J3E_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2733 8 1 7 0 34
3J3F_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2930 4 1 3 0 36
3J3F_8 0.19 0.11 0.33 2 4755 5 3 1 1 17
3RKF_A 0.84 0.75 0.95 18 847 1 1 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3UZL_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1287 6 3 3 0 16
3W1K_J 0.57 0.35 0.92 11 1666 1 0 1 0 20
3W3S_B 0.45 0.36 0.57 12 1968 10 1 8 1 21
3ZEX_C 0.13 0.07 0.25 2 5366 6 2 4 0 27
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2794 2 0 2 0 35
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1189 4 0 2 2 8
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2759 4 2 2 0 37
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4512 5 2 2 1 20
4AOB_A 0.42 0.21 0.86 6 1430 1 0 1 0 23
4ENB_A 0.34 0.20 0.60 3 467 2 0 2 0 12
4ENC_A 0.34 0.20 0.60 3 491 2 0 2 0 12
4FRG_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1200 2 0 2 0 24
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1845 3 0 3 0 28
4JF2_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1078 4 0 4 0 24

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 26
Total TN 52836
Total FP 80
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 14
Total FP COMP 65
Total FN 627
Total Scores
MCC 0.157
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.062 ± 0.069
Sensitivity 0.040
Positive Predictive Value 0.634
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.33 0.75 6 520 2 0 2 0 12
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1157 0 0 0 0 19
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1159 0 0 0 0 21
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1112 0 0 0 0 20
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1219 0 0 0 0 21
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3020 0 0 0 0 34
3J3D_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 968 0 0 0 0 19
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2742 6 0 0 6 15
3J3E_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2741 0 0 0 0 34
3J3F_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2934 0 0 0 0 36
3J3F_8 0.19 0.11 0.33 2 4755 24 0 4 20 17
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1293 0 0 0 0 16
3W1K_J 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1678 0 0 0 0 31
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1989 0 0 0 0 33
3ZEX_C 0.15 0.07 0.33 2 5368 24 0 4 20 27
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2796 0 0 0 0 35
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1191 0 0 0 0 8
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2763 0 0 0 0 37
4A1C_2 0.10 0.05 0.20 1 4511 23 0 4 19 19
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1848 0 0 0 0 28
4JF2_A 0.76 0.63 0.94 15 1066 1 1 0 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.