CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Sfold & Mastr(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Sfold Mastr(20)
MCC 0.707 > 0.620
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.714 ± 0.080 > 0.584 ± 0.128
Sensitivity 0.683 > 0.473
Positive Predictive Value 0.736 < 0.819
Total TP 612 > 424
Total TN 92031 < 92344
Total FP 372 > 174
Total FP CONTRA 57 > 16
Total FP INCONS 162 > 78
Total FP COMP 153 > 80
Total FN 284 < 472
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Sfold and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Mastr(20)).

  2. Comparison of performance of Sfold and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Mastr(20)).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Mastr(20)).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Mastr(20)).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Sfold and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Mastr(20)).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Sfold and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Mastr(20)).

^top





Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 612
Total TN 92031
Total FP 372
Total FP CONTRA 57
Total FP INCONS 162
Total FP COMP 153
Total FN 284
Total Scores
MCC 0.707
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.714 ± 0.080
Sensitivity 0.683
Positive Predictive Value 0.736
Nr of predictions 34

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2WRQ_Y 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 1144 14 0 0 14 1
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 25 0 6 19 3
2XQD_Y 0.85 0.81 0.89 17 1110 3 0 2 1 4
2XXA_G 0.37 0.34 0.41 12 2016 18 1 16 1 23
3A2K_C 0.47 0.50 0.46 11 1084 13 3 10 0 11
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3G4S_9 0.78 0.77 0.80 20 2711 12 2 3 7 6
3GX2_A 0.86 0.79 0.96 22 1426 2 1 0 1 6
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.59 0.56 0.63 53 25452 34 14 17 3 42
3IZF_C 0.89 0.91 0.86 32 2603 8 0 5 3 3
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 3 10 1 9
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 7 0 5 2 5
3J2L_3 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2984 12 1 7 4 6
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1095 16 2 14 0 20
3JYX_4 0.68 0.83 0.56 10 4738 23 7 1 15 2
3JYX_3 0.77 0.80 0.75 12 2362 24 0 4 20 3
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.85 0.78 0.94 29 2247 7 0 2 5 8
3O58_2 0.87 0.90 0.85 28 2721 11 0 5 6 3
3O58_3 0.51 0.50 0.52 11 4743 18 2 8 8 11
3PDR_A 0.82 0.80 0.85 40 4793 9 2 5 2 10
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.78 0.72 0.84 21 1508 4 2 2 0 8
3ZEX_C 0.41 0.34 0.50 10 5354 27 2 8 17 19
3ZEX_D 0.85 0.80 0.90 28 2765 8 0 3 5 7
4A1C_3 0.83 0.81 0.86 30 2728 7 0 5 2 7
4A1C_2 0.21 0.25 0.19 5 4489 34 8 14 12 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.67 0.58 0.78 14 1184 4 3 1 0 10

^top



Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 424
Total TN 92344
Total FP 174
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 78
Total FP COMP 80
Total FN 472
Total Scores
MCC 0.620
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.584 ± 0.128
Sensitivity 0.473
Positive Predictive Value 0.819
Nr of predictions 34

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 341 2 0 1 1 3
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 13 0 0 13 0
2XKV_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 1831 3 0 0 3 7
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.44 0.20 1.00 7 2038 0 0 0 0 28
3A2K_C 0.81 0.77 0.85 17 1088 3 0 3 0 5
3AMU_B 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1142 2 0 0 2 4
3G4S_9 0.68 0.62 0.76 16 2715 10 2 3 5 10
3GX2_A 0.46 0.39 0.55 11 1429 10 2 7 1 17
3IVN_B 0.86 0.83 0.90 19 882 2 2 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 25536 0 0 0 0 95
3IZF_C 0.91 0.91 0.91 32 2605 9 0 3 6 3
3J20_0 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1198 2 1 0 1 1
3J20_1 0.26 0.25 0.29 5 1095 12 1 11 0 15
3J2L_3 0.42 0.38 0.48 13 2993 16 2 12 2 21
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4756 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_3 0.77 0.80 0.75 12 2362 26 0 4 22 3
3LA5_A 0.89 0.80 1.00 20 934 0 0 0 0 5
3NPB_A 0.34 0.30 0.41 11 2251 18 1 15 2 26
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 12 0 2 10 2
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4764 0 0 0 0 22
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4840 0 0 0 0 50
3RKF_A 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 849 0 0 0 0 7
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5374 0 0 0 0 29
3ZEX_D 0.93 0.91 0.94 32 2762 7 0 2 5 3
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 7 0 4 3 5
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4AOB_A 0.42 0.34 0.53 10 1418 10 1 8 1 19
4ENB_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 3 469 0 0 0 0 12
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.