CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Sfold & Mastr(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Sfold Mastr(seed)
MCC 0.705 > 0.279
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.725 ± 0.070 > 0.112 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.693 > 0.088
Positive Predictive Value 0.723 < 0.899
Total TP 917 > 116
Total TN 131238 < 132378
Total FP 539 > 16
Total FP CONTRA 113 > 0
Total FP INCONS 239 > 13
Total FP COMP 187 > 3
Total FN 407 < 1208
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Sfold and Mastr(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Mastr(seed)).

  2. Comparison of performance of Sfold and Mastr(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Mastr(seed)).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Mastr(seed)).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Mastr(seed)).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Sfold and Mastr(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Mastr(seed)).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Sfold and Mastr(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Mastr(seed)).

^top





Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 917
Total TN 131238
Total FP 539
Total FP CONTRA 113
Total FP INCONS 239
Total FP COMP 187
Total FN 407
Total Scores
MCC 0.705
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.725 ± 0.070
Sensitivity 0.693
Positive Predictive Value 0.723
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2KE6_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 449 2 0 1 1 1
2KUR_A 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 448 1 0 1 0 1
2KUU_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 429 2 0 1 1 1
2KUV_A 0.94 0.95 0.95 18 420 1 0 1 0 1
2KUW_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 452 2 0 1 1 1
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.46 0.39 0.58 7 516 5 0 5 0 11
2WRQ_Y 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 1144 14 0 0 14 1
2WWQ_V 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1185 2 0 0 2 0
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 25 0 6 19 3
2XQD_Y 0.85 0.81 0.89 17 1110 3 0 2 1 4
2XXA_G 0.37 0.34 0.41 12 2016 18 1 16 1 23
2ZZM_B 0.07 0.07 0.10 1 1348 17 3 6 8 14
2ZZN_D 0.93 0.95 0.91 21 961 3 2 0 1 1
3A2K_C 0.47 0.50 0.46 11 1084 13 3 10 0 11
3A3A_A 0.97 0.93 1.00 28 1472 0 0 0 0 2
3AKZ_H 0.49 0.50 0.50 10 1107 12 3 7 2 10
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3G4S_9 0.78 0.77 0.80 20 2711 12 2 3 7 6
3GX2_A 0.86 0.79 0.96 22 1426 2 1 0 1 6
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IYQ_A 0.25 0.33 0.19 17 22350 86 39 34 13 34
3IZ4_A 0.59 0.56 0.63 53 25452 34 14 17 3 42
3IZF_C 0.89 0.91 0.86 32 2603 8 0 5 3 3
3J16_L 0.34 0.33 0.37 7 1140 12 0 12 0 14
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 7 0 5 2 5
3J20_0 0.51 0.57 0.48 12 1194 14 3 10 1 9
3J2L_3 0.80 0.82 0.78 28 2984 12 1 7 4 6
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1095 16 2 14 0 20
3JYX_3 0.77 0.80 0.75 12 2362 24 0 4 20 3
3JYX_4 0.68 0.83 0.56 10 4738 23 7 1 15 2
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.85 0.78 0.94 29 2247 7 0 2 5 8
3O58_3 0.51 0.50 0.52 11 4743 18 2 8 8 11
3O58_2 0.87 0.90 0.85 28 2721 11 0 5 6 3
3PDR_A 0.82 0.80 0.85 40 4793 9 2 5 2 10
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.78 0.72 0.84 21 1508 4 2 2 0 8
3UZL_B 0.60 0.50 0.73 8 1282 7 3 0 4 8
3W3S_B 0.63 0.64 0.64 21 1956 13 4 8 1 12
3ZEX_C 0.41 0.34 0.50 10 5354 27 2 8 17 19
3ZEX_D 0.85 0.80 0.90 28 2765 8 0 3 5 7
4A1C_3 0.83 0.81 0.86 30 2728 7 0 5 2 7
4A1C_2 0.21 0.25 0.19 5 4489 34 8 14 12 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.67 0.58 0.78 14 1184 4 3 1 0 10
4FRN_A 0.71 0.57 0.89 16 1830 2 2 0 0 12

^top



Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 116
Total TN 132378
Total FP 16
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 13
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 1208
Total Scores
MCC 0.279
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.112 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.088
Positive Predictive Value 0.899
Nr of predictions 53

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 174 0 0 0 0 10
2KE6_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 451 1 0 0 1 2
2KUR_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 15 450 2 0 2 0 4
2KUU_A 0.82 0.78 0.88 14 431 3 0 2 1 4
2KUV_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 15 422 2 0 2 0 4
2KUW_A 0.51 0.50 0.56 9 454 8 0 7 1 9
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 371 0 0 0 0 16
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 357 0 0 0 0 18
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 528 0 0 0 0 18
2WRQ_Y 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1152 0 0 0 0 9
2WWQ_V 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1204 0 0 0 0 19
2XKV_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1835 0 0 0 0 11
2XQD_Y 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1129 0 0 0 0 21
2XXA_G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2045 0 0 0 0 35
2ZZM_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1358 0 0 0 0 15
2ZZN_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 984 0 0 0 0 22
3A2K_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1108 0 0 0 0 22
3A3A_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1500 0 0 0 0 30
3AKZ_H 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1127 0 0 0 0 20
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1157 0 0 0 0 19
3G4S_9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2736 0 0 0 0 26
3GX2_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1449 0 0 0 0 28
3IVN_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 903 0 0 0 0 23
3IYQ_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 22440 0 0 0 0 51
3IZ4_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 25536 0 0 0 0 95
3IZF_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2640 0 0 0 0 35
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1159 0 0 0 0 21
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1112 0 0 0 0 20
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1219 0 0 0 0 21
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3020 0 0 0 0 34
3JYV_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1111 0 0 0 0 20
3JYX_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2378 0 0 0 0 15
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4756 0 0 0 0 12
3LA5_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 954 0 0 0 0 25
3NPB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2278 0 0 0 0 37
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4764 0 0 0 0 22
3O58_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2754 0 0 0 0 31
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4840 0 0 0 0 50
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1293 0 0 0 0 16
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1989 0 0 0 0 33
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5374 0 0 0 0 29
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2796 0 0 0 0 35
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2763 0 0 0 0 37
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1848 0 0 0 0 28

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.