CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Sfold & Multilign(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Sfold Multilign(seed)
MCC 0.681 > 0.649
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.688 ± 0.171 > 0.617 ± 0.295
Sensitivity 0.625 > 0.591
Positive Predictive Value 0.751 > 0.724
Total TP 130 > 123
Total TN 13759 < 13762
Total FP 63 > 50
Total FP CONTRA 14 > 12
Total FP INCONS 29 < 35
Total FP COMP 20 > 3
Total FN 78 < 85
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Sfold and Multilign(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Multilign(seed)).

  2. Comparison of performance of Sfold and Multilign(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Multilign(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Sfold and Multilign(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Multilign(seed)).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Sfold and Multilign(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Multilign(seed)).

^top





Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 130
Total TN 13759
Total FP 63
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 78
Total Scores
MCC 0.681
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.688 ± 0.171
Sensitivity 0.625
Positive Predictive Value 0.751
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.46 0.39 0.58 7 516 5 0 5 0 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.78 0.72 0.84 21 1508 4 2 2 0 8
3W3S_B 0.63 0.64 0.64 21 1956 13 4 8 1 12
3ZEX_C 0.41 0.34 0.50 10 5354 27 2 8 17 19
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4FRN_A 0.71 0.57 0.89 16 1830 2 2 0 0 12

^top



Performance of Multilign(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 123
Total TN 13762
Total FP 50
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 35
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 85
Total Scores
MCC 0.649
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.617 ± 0.295
Sensitivity 0.591
Positive Predictive Value 0.724
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 340 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 2 10 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.66 0.68 19 1505 9 4 5 0 10
3W3S_B 0.92 0.88 0.97 29 1959 2 0 1 1 4
3ZEX_C 0.50 0.45 0.57 13 5351 11 3 7 1 16
4AOB_A 0.73 0.66 0.83 19 1414 5 1 3 1 10
4FRN_A 0.27 0.21 0.35 6 1831 11 2 9 0 22

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.