CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(20) & CentroidFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(20) CentroidFold
MCC 0.758 > 0.671
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.744 ± 0.102 > 0.660 ± 0.116
Sensitivity 0.748 > 0.674
Positive Predictive Value 0.773 > 0.675
Total TP 374 > 337
Total TN 43173 > 43158
Total FP 185 < 228
Total FP CONTRA 36 < 55
Total FP INCONS 74 < 107
Total FP COMP 75 > 66
Total FN 126 < 163
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and CentroidFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and CentroidFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and CentroidFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and CentroidFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and CentroidFold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 374
Total TN 43173
Total FP 185
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 74
Total FP COMP 75
Total FN 126
Total Scores
MCC 0.758
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.744 ± 0.102
Sensitivity 0.748
Positive Predictive Value 0.773
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 1 5 1 5
3J2L_3 0.92 0.91 0.94 31 2987 5 1 1 3 3
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_7 0.88 0.85 0.91 29 2709 8 0 3 5 5
3J3E_8 0.27 0.33 0.23 5 2720 28 6 11 11 10
3J3F_8 0.42 0.53 0.34 10 4732 37 9 10 18 9
3J3F_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 2898 4 1 1 2 2
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.49 0.45 0.54 13 5350 15 2 9 4 16
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.80 0.93 28 2766 6 0 2 4 7
3ZND_W 0.64 0.75 0.55 6 1180 15 2 3 10 2
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 28 6 13 9 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3

^top



Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 337
Total TN 43158
Total FP 228
Total FP CONTRA 55
Total FP INCONS 107
Total FP COMP 66
Total FN 163
Total Scores
MCC 0.671
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.660 ± 0.116
Sensitivity 0.674
Positive Predictive Value 0.675
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 2 0 0 2 0
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J2L_3 0.74 0.76 0.72 26 2984 15 1 9 5 8
3J3D_C 0.73 0.79 0.68 15 946 7 3 4 0 4
3J3E_7 0.61 0.59 0.65 20 2710 13 2 9 2 14
3J3E_8 0.12 0.13 0.13 2 2726 22 4 10 8 13
3J3F_8 0.36 0.47 0.28 9 4729 37 12 11 14 10
3J3F_7 0.84 0.86 0.82 31 2896 9 1 6 2 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.70 0.69 0.71 20 1505 8 4 4 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.48 0.34 0.67 10 5359 6 1 4 1 19
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.86 0.91 30 2763 8 0 3 5 5
3ZND_W 0.24 0.38 0.16 3 1172 25 9 7 9 5
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 8 0 6 2 8
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.19 5 4490 29 9 12 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4
4FRG_B 0.75 0.71 0.81 17 1181 4 3 1 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.