CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	TurboFold(20)		CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC	0.796	>	0.760
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.791 ± 0.111	>	0.769 ± 0.134
Sensitivity	0.762	>	0.744
Positive Predictive Value	0.838	>	0.783
Total TP	259	>	253
Total TN	22637	>	22623
Total FP	75	<	102
Total FP CONTRA	13	<	22
Total FP INCONS	37	<	48
Total FP COMP	25	<	32
Total FN	81	<	87
P-value	3.36290909588e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

^top

Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	259
Total TN	22637
Total FP	75
Total FP CONTRA	13
Total FP INCONS	37
Total FP COMP	25
Total FN	81

Total Scores
MCC	0.796
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.791 ± 0.111
Sensitivity	0.762
Positive Predictive Value	0.838
Nr of predictions	14

^top

2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.94	0.94	0.94	17	339	2	0	1	1	1
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.81	0.79	0.83	15	1139	6	0	3	3	4
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	20	1092	1	0	0	1	0
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.74	0.76	0.73	16	1197	7	1	5	1	5
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.92	0.91	0.94	31	2987	5	1	1	3	3
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	20	846	0	0	0	0	4
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.69	0.74	20	1506	7	2	5	0	9
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.80	0.93	28	2766	6	0	2	4	7
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.84	0.89	31	2728	6	0	4	2	6
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.22	0.25	0.21	5	4492	28	6	13	9	15
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.67	0.59	0.77	17	1415	6	2	3	1	12
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.60	1.00	9	463	0	0	0	0	6
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.73	0.60	0.90	9	486	1	1	0	0	6
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.88	1.00	21	1181	0	0	0	0	3

^top

Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	253
Total TN	22623
Total FP	102
Total FP CONTRA	22
Total FP INCONS	48
Total FP COMP	32
Total FN	87

Total Scores
MCC	0.760
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.769 ± 0.134
Sensitivity	0.744
Positive Predictive Value	0.783
Nr of predictions	14

^top

2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.94	0.94	0.94	17	339	2	0	1	1	1
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.95	0.95	0.95	18	1138	4	0	1	3	1
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	20	1092	1	0	0	1	0
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.41	0.52	0.34	11	1187	22	7	14	1	10
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.94	0.94	0.94	32	2986	8	0	2	6	2
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.75	1.00	18	848	0	0	0	0	6
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.66	0.90	19	1512	2	1	1	0	10
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.83	0.91	29	2764	8	0	3	5	6
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.80	0.78	0.83	29	2728	7	0	6	1	8
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.24	0.25	0.24	5	4495	29	8	8	13	15
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.72	1.00	21	1416	1	0	0	1	8
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	461	0	0	0	0	4
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	485	0	0	0	0	4
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.43	0.50	0.40	12	1172	18	6	12	0	12

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]