CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(20) & IPknot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(20) IPknot
MCC 0.764 > 0.712
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.759 ± 0.117 > 0.707 ± 0.119
Sensitivity 0.726 > 0.678
Positive Predictive Value 0.810 > 0.756
Total TP 255 > 238
Total TN 27648 = 27648
Total FP 88 < 105
Total FP CONTRA 15 < 18
Total FP INCONS 45 < 59
Total FP COMP 28 = 28
Total FN 96 < 113
P-value 2.04409141234e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and IPknot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and IPknot).

  2. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and IPknot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and IPknot).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and IPknot).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and IPknot).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and IPknot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and IPknot).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and IPknot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and IPknot).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 255
Total TN 27648
Total FP 88
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 45
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 96
Total Scores
MCC 0.764
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.759 ± 0.117
Sensitivity 0.726
Positive Predictive Value 0.810
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 1 5 1 5
3J2L_3 0.92 0.91 0.94 31 2987 5 1 1 3 3
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.49 0.45 0.54 13 5350 15 2 9 4 16
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.80 0.93 28 2766 6 0 2 4 7
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 28 6 13 9 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3

^top



Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 238
Total TN 27648
Total FP 105
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 59
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 113
Total Scores
MCC 0.712
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.707 ± 0.119
Sensitivity 0.678
Positive Predictive Value 0.756
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 3 8 1 9
3J2L_3 0.82 0.82 0.82 28 2986 10 0 6 4 6
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.74 0.69 0.80 20 1508 5 0 5 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.51 0.34 0.77 10 5361 7 1 2 4 19
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.80 0.82 28 2762 10 0 6 4 7
4A1C_3 0.83 0.81 0.86 30 2728 7 0 5 2 7
4A1C_2 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4493 26 8 10 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.59 0.53 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 7
4FRG_B 0.75 0.71 0.81 17 1181 4 3 1 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.