CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(20) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(20) MCFold
MCC 0.752 > 0.518
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.734 ± 0.109 > 0.514 ± 0.137
Sensitivity 0.747 > 0.574
Positive Predictive Value 0.762 > 0.478
Total TP 337 > 259
Total TN 40666 > 40566
Total FP 178 < 367
Total FP CONTRA 34 < 79
Total FP INCONS 71 < 204
Total FP COMP 73 < 84
Total FN 114 < 192
P-value 2.91763127434e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 337
Total TN 40666
Total FP 178
Total FP CONTRA 34
Total FP INCONS 71
Total FP COMP 73
Total FN 114
Total Scores
MCC 0.752
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.734 ± 0.109
Sensitivity 0.747
Positive Predictive Value 0.762
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 1 5 1 5
3J2L_3 0.92 0.91 0.94 31 2987 5 1 1 3 3
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_7 0.88 0.85 0.91 29 2709 8 0 3 5 5
3J3E_8 0.27 0.33 0.23 5 2720 28 6 11 11 10
3J3F_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 2898 4 1 1 2 2
3J3F_8 0.42 0.53 0.34 10 4732 37 9 10 18 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.49 0.45 0.54 13 5350 15 2 9 4 16
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.80 0.93 28 2766 6 0 2 4 7
3ZND_W 0.64 0.75 0.55 6 1180 15 2 3 10 2
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 28 6 13 9 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 259
Total TN 40566
Total FP 367
Total FP CONTRA 79
Total FP INCONS 204
Total FP COMP 84
Total FN 192
Total Scores
MCC 0.518
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.514 ± 0.137
Sensitivity 0.574
Positive Predictive Value 0.478
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
3AMU_B 0.50 0.58 0.44 11 1132 15 4 10 1 8
3J20_0 0.66 0.71 0.63 15 1195 11 3 6 2 6
3J2L_3 0.77 0.79 0.75 27 2984 15 1 8 6 7
3J3D_C 0.54 0.63 0.48 12 943 13 4 9 0 7
3J3E_7 0.55 0.56 0.54 19 2706 23 1 15 7 15
3J3E_8 0.15 0.20 0.12 3 2716 36 11 12 13 12
3J3F_7 0.88 0.89 0.86 32 2897 9 1 4 4 4
3J3F_8 0.14 0.21 0.10 4 4720 51 17 20 14 15
3RKF_A 0.89 0.88 0.91 21 843 3 0 2 1 3
3SD1_A 0.43 0.45 0.43 13 1503 17 1 16 0 16
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.27 10 5337 28 6 21 1 19
3ZEX_D 0.23 0.26 0.23 9 2756 33 6 25 2 26
3ZND_W 0.23 0.38 0.15 3 1171 26 9 8 9 5
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 45 12 19 14 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.86 0.86 32 2726 9 0 5 4 5
4ENB_A 0.78 0.73 0.85 11 459 4 0 2 2 4
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 11 0 8 3 10
4FRG_B 0.35 0.38 0.35 9 1176 17 3 14 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.