CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(20) & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(20) Multilign(20)
MCC 0.796 > 0.699
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.791 ± 0.111 > 0.684 ± 0.159
Sensitivity 0.762 > 0.688
Positive Predictive Value 0.838 > 0.718
Total TP 259 > 234
Total TN 22637 > 22620
Total FP 75 < 119
Total FP CONTRA 13 < 21
Total FP INCONS 37 < 71
Total FP COMP 25 < 27
Total FN 81 < 106
P-value 2.43573297697e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and Multilign(20)).

  2. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and Multilign(20)).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and Multilign(20)).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and Multilign(20)).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and Multilign(20)).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 259
Total TN 22637
Total FP 75
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 37
Total FP COMP 25
Total FN 81
Total Scores
MCC 0.796
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.791 ± 0.111
Sensitivity 0.762
Positive Predictive Value 0.838
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 1 5 1 5
3J2L_3 0.92 0.91 0.94 31 2987 5 1 1 3 3
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.80 0.93 28 2766 6 0 2 4 7
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 28 6 13 9 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 234
Total TN 22620
Total FP 119
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 71
Total FP COMP 27
Total FN 106
Total Scores
MCC 0.699
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.684 ± 0.159
Sensitivity 0.688
Positive Predictive Value 0.718
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
3AMU_B 0.71 0.74 0.70 14 1137 9 0 6 3 5
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J20_0 0.68 0.71 0.65 15 1196 9 2 6 1 6
3J2L_3 0.80 0.79 0.82 27 2987 10 0 6 4 7
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
3ZEX_D 0.88 0.83 0.94 29 2765 8 0 2 6 6
4A1C_3 0.88 0.86 0.89 32 2727 6 0 4 2 5
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.16 5 4485 33 9 17 7 15
4AOB_A 0.59 0.55 0.64 16 1412 10 3 6 1 13
4ENB_A 0.39 0.33 0.50 5 462 6 0 5 1 10
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.13 0.13 0.17 3 1184 15 2 13 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.