CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	TurboFold(20)		NanoFolder
MCC	0.773	>	0.329
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.752 ± 0.239	>	0.353 ± 0.217
Sensitivity	0.742	>	0.405
Positive Predictive Value	0.810	>	0.283
Total TP	141	>	77
Total TN	15966	>	15868
Total FP	53	<	216
Total FP CONTRA	10	<	62
Total FP INCONS	23	<	133
Total FP COMP	20	<	21
Total FN	49	<	113
P-value	0.0

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and NanoFolder).
Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and NanoFolder).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and NanoFolder).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and NanoFolder).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and NanoFolder).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and NanoFolder).

^top

Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	141
Total TN	15966
Total FP	53
Total FP CONTRA	10
Total FP INCONS	23
Total FP COMP	20
Total FN	49

Total Scores
MCC	0.773
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.752 ± 0.239
Sensitivity	0.742
Positive Predictive Value	0.810
Nr of predictions	7

^top

2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	20	1092	1	0	0	1	0
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.92	0.91	0.94	31	2987	5	1	1	3	3
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.80	0.93	28	2766	6	0	2	4	7
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.84	0.89	31	2728	6	0	4	2	6
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.22	0.25	0.21	5	4492	28	6	13	9	15
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.67	0.59	0.77	17	1415	6	2	3	1	12
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.73	0.60	0.90	9	486	1	1	0	0	6

^top

Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	77
Total TN	15868
Total FP	216
Total FP CONTRA	62
Total FP INCONS	133
Total FP COMP	21
Total FN	113

Total Scores
MCC	0.329
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.353 ± 0.217
Sensitivity	0.405
Positive Predictive Value	0.283
Nr of predictions	7

^top

2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.42	0.50	0.37	10	1085	20	5	12	3	10
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.13	0.18	0.12	6	2969	46	14	31	1	28
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.30	0.37	0.27	13	2747	36	10	26	0	22
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.58	0.68	0.51	25	2714	24	9	15	0	12
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	4469	61	18	29	14	20
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.39	0.41	0.39	12	1406	20	4	15	1	17
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.73	0.61	11	478	9	2	5	2	4

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]