CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	TurboFold(20)		RNASLOpt
MCC	0.755	>	0.635
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.746 ± 0.151	>	0.657 ± 0.163
Sensitivity	0.717	>	0.616
Positive Predictive Value	0.800	>	0.662
Total TP	200	>	172
Total TN	24157	>	24147
Total FP	75	<	121
Total FP CONTRA	13	<	31
Total FP INCONS	37	<	57
Total FP COMP	25	<	33
Total FN	79	<	107
P-value	1.04628667909e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNASLOpt).
Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNASLOpt).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNASLOpt).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNASLOpt).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNASLOpt).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNASLOpt).

^top

Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	200
Total TN	24157
Total FP	75
Total FP CONTRA	13
Total FP INCONS	37
Total FP COMP	25
Total FN	79

Total Scores
MCC	0.755
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.746 ± 0.151
Sensitivity	0.717
Positive Predictive Value	0.800
Nr of predictions	11

^top

2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.74	0.76	0.73	16	1197	7	1	5	1	5
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	20	1092	1	0	0	1	0
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.92	0.91	0.94	31	2987	5	1	1	3	3
3ZEX_C	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.49	0.45	0.54	13	5350	15	2	9	4	16
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.80	0.93	28	2766	6	0	2	4	7
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.22	0.25	0.21	5	4492	28	6	13	9	15
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.84	0.89	31	2728	6	0	4	2	6
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.67	0.59	0.77	17	1415	6	2	3	1	12
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.60	1.00	9	463	0	0	0	0	6
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.73	0.60	0.90	9	486	1	1	0	0	6
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.88	1.00	21	1181	0	0	0	0	3

^top

Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	172
Total TN	24147
Total FP	121
Total FP CONTRA	31
Total FP INCONS	57
Total FP COMP	33
Total FN	107

Total Scores
MCC	0.635
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.657 ± 0.163
Sensitivity	0.616
Positive Predictive Value	0.662
Nr of predictions	11

^top

2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.74	0.76	0.73	16	1197	7	3	3	1	5
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	20	1092	1	0	0	1	0
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.68	0.74	23	2989	11	0	8	3	11
3ZEX_C	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.32	0.34	0.31	10	5342	36	8	14	14	19
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.74	1.00	26	2770	4	0	0	4	9
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.30	0.40	0.24	8	4482	35	13	13	9	12
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.79	0.73	0.87	27	2732	5	0	4	1	10
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.31	0.28	0.38	8	1416	13	3	10	0	21
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	461	0	0	0	0	4
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.73	0.60	0.90	9	486	1	1	0	0	6
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.60	0.58	0.64	14	1180	8	3	5	0	10

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]