CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	TurboFold(20)		RNAfold
MCC	0.773	>	0.674
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.771 ± 0.111	>	0.682 ± 0.150
Sensitivity	0.737	>	0.686
Positive Predictive Value	0.817	>	0.671
Total TP	272	>	253
Total TN	27987	>	27943
Total FP	90	<	176
Total FP CONTRA	15	<	30
Total FP INCONS	46	<	94
Total FP COMP	29	<	52
Total FN	97	<	116
P-value	2.8150742666e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and RNAfold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNAfold).
Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and RNAfold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNAfold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNAfold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNAfold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and RNAfold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNAfold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and RNAfold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNAfold).

^top

Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	272
Total TN	27987
Total FP	90
Total FP CONTRA	15
Total FP INCONS	46
Total FP COMP	29
Total FN	97

Total Scores
MCC	0.773
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.771 ± 0.111
Sensitivity	0.737
Positive Predictive Value	0.817
Nr of predictions	15

^top

2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.94	0.94	0.94	17	339	2	0	1	1	1
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.81	0.79	0.83	15	1139	6	0	3	3	4
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	20	1092	1	0	0	1	0
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.74	0.76	0.73	16	1197	7	1	5	1	5
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.92	0.91	0.94	31	2987	5	1	1	3	3
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	20	846	0	0	0	0	4
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.69	0.74	20	1506	7	2	5	0	9
3ZEX_C	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.49	0.45	0.54	13	5350	15	2	9	4	16
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.80	0.93	28	2766	6	0	2	4	7
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.84	0.89	31	2728	6	0	4	2	6
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.22	0.25	0.21	5	4492	28	6	13	9	15
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.67	0.59	0.77	17	1415	6	2	3	1	12
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.60	1.00	9	463	0	0	0	0	6
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.73	0.60	0.90	9	486	1	1	0	0	6
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.88	1.00	21	1181	0	0	0	0	3

^top

Performance of RNAfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	253
Total TN	27943
Total FP	176
Total FP CONTRA	30
Total FP INCONS	94
Total FP COMP	52
Total FN	116

Total Scores
MCC	0.674
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.682 ± 0.150
Sensitivity	0.686
Positive Predictive Value	0.671
Nr of predictions	15

^top

2. Individual counts for RNAfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	18	339	1	0	0	1	0
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.81	0.79	0.83	15	1139	6	0	3	3	4
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	20	1092	3	0	0	3	0
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.51	0.57	0.48	12	1194	14	3	10	1	9
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.80	0.82	0.78	28	2984	12	1	7	4	6
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	20	846	0	0	0	0	4
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.76	0.79	22	1505	6	4	2	0	7
3ZEX_C	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.30	0.34	0.26	10	5336	43	5	23	15	19
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.88	0.83	0.94	29	2765	6	0	2	4	6
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.88	0.86	0.89	32	2727	7	0	4	3	5
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.19	0.25	0.15	5	4482	43	11	18	14	15
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.60	0.59	0.63	17	1410	11	4	6	1	12
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	461	2	0	0	2	4
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.37	0.33	0.45	5	485	7	0	6	1	10
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.36	0.38	0.38	9	1178	15	2	13	0	15

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

Performance of RNAfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAfold

2. Individual counts for RNAfold [ download as .csv ]