CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(20) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(20) RNAwolf
MCC 0.751 > 0.429
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.734 ± 0.105 > 0.454 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.741 > 0.446
Positive Predictive Value 0.766 > 0.426
Total TP 357 > 215
Total TN 42834 > 42795
Total FP 183 < 358
Total FP CONTRA 36 < 76
Total FP INCONS 73 < 214
Total FP COMP 74 > 68
Total FN 125 < 267
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 357
Total TN 42834
Total FP 183
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 73
Total FP COMP 74
Total FN 125
Total Scores
MCC 0.751
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.734 ± 0.105
Sensitivity 0.741
Positive Predictive Value 0.766
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3J20_0 0.74 0.76 0.73 16 1197 7 1 5 1 5
3J20_1 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1092 1 0 0 1 0
3J2L_3 0.92 0.91 0.94 31 2987 5 1 1 3 3
3J3D_C 0.90 0.95 0.86 18 947 3 3 0 0 1
3J3E_7 0.88 0.85 0.91 29 2709 8 0 3 5 5
3J3E_8 0.27 0.33 0.23 5 2720 28 6 11 11 10
3J3F_7 0.94 0.94 0.94 34 2898 4 1 1 2 2
3J3F_8 0.42 0.53 0.34 10 4732 37 9 10 18 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3ZEX_D 0.86 0.80 0.93 28 2766 6 0 2 4 7
3ZEX_C 0.49 0.45 0.54 13 5350 15 2 9 4 16
3ZND_W 0.64 0.75 0.55 6 1180 15 2 3 10 2
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 28 6 13 9 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.93 0.88 1.00 21 1181 0 0 0 0 3

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 215
Total TN 42795
Total FP 358
Total FP CONTRA 76
Total FP INCONS 214
Total FP COMP 68
Total FN 267
Total Scores
MCC 0.429
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.454 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.446
Positive Predictive Value 0.426
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3J20_0 0.54 0.57 0.52 12 1196 12 2 9 1 9
3J20_1 0.53 0.55 0.52 11 1091 11 4 6 1 9
3J2L_3 0.71 0.71 0.73 24 2987 13 1 8 4 10
3J3D_C 0.92 0.95 0.90 18 948 3 2 0 1 1
3J3E_7 0.57 0.56 0.59 19 2709 15 1 12 2 15
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2719 37 6 17 14 15
3J3F_7 0.27 0.28 0.28 10 2898 27 4 22 1 26
3J3F_8 0.28 0.37 0.23 7 4730 39 9 15 15 12
3RKF_A 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 845 1 0 1 0 4
3SD1_A 0.58 0.59 0.59 17 1504 12 2 10 0 12
3ZEX_D 0.26 0.26 0.27 9 2763 24 8 16 0 26
3ZEX_C 0.08 0.10 0.07 3 5328 43 18 25 0 26
3ZND_W 0.67 0.75 0.60 6 1181 15 0 4 11 2
4A1C_3 0.32 0.30 0.35 11 2732 21 1 19 1 26
4A1C_2 0.12 0.15 0.10 3 4487 38 12 14 12 17
4AOB_A 0.26 0.24 0.30 7 1414 17 2 14 1 22
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 10
4FRG_B 0.54 0.50 0.60 12 1182 8 3 5 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.