CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

FAQ

Metric	TurboFold(seed)		CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC	0.666	>	0.649
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.654 ± 0.227	>	0.651 ± 0.237
Sensitivity	0.635	>	0.618
Positive Predictive Value	0.708	>	0.692
Total TP	148	>	144
Total TN	14607	<	14608
Total FP	77	<	80
Total FP CONTRA	18	<	20
Total FP INCONS	43	<	44
Total FP COMP	16	=	16
Total FN	85	<	89
P-value	2.8740818951e-06

Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

Total Scores
MCC	0.666
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.654 ± 0.227
Sensitivity	0.635
Positive Predictive Value	0.708
Nr of predictions	10

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.94	0.94	0.94	17	339	2	0	1	1	1
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.03	0.00	0.00	0	513	15	3	12	0	18
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	20	846	0	0	0	0	4
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.69	0.74	20	1506	7	2	5	0	9
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.84	0.89	31	2728	6	0	4	2	6
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.20	0.25	0.17	5	4486	37	9	16	12	15
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.67	0.59	0.77	17	1415	6	2	3	1	12
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.60	1.00	9	463	0	0	0	0	6
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.73	0.60	0.90	9	486	1	1	0	0	6
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.79	0.71	0.87	20	1825	3	1	2	0	8

Total Scores
MCC	0.649
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.651 ± 0.237
Sensitivity	0.618
Positive Predictive Value	0.692
Nr of predictions	10

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.94	0.94	0.94	17	339	2	0	1	1	1
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.03	0.00	0.00	0	517	11	0	11	0	18
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.75	1.00	18	848	0	0	0	0	6
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.66	0.90	19	1512	2	1	1	0	10
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.80	0.78	0.83	29	2728	7	0	6	1	8
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.24	0.25	0.24	5	4495	29	8	8	13	15
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.72	1.00	21	1416	1	0	0	1	8
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	461	0	0	0	0	4
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	485	0	0	0	0	4
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.37	0.46	0.32	13	1807	28	11	17	0	15

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.