CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PETfold_2.0(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & PETfold_2.0(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) PETfold_2.0(seed)
MCC 0.967 > 0.831
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.967 ± > 0.831 ±
Sensitivity 0.968 > 0.806
Positive Predictive Value 0.968 > 0.862
Total TP 30 > 25
Total TN 1647 < 1649
Total FP 1 < 5
Total FP CONTRA 1 < 2
Total FP INCONS 0 < 2
Total FP COMP 0 < 1
Total FN 1 < 6
P-value 0.0

^top



Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and PETfold_2.0(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and PETfold_2.0(seed)).

  2. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and PETfold_2.0(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and PETfold_2.0(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and PETfold_2.0(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and PETfold_2.0(seed)).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and PETfold_2.0(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and PETfold_2.0(seed)).

^top




Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 30
Total TN 1647
Total FP 1
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 0
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 1
Total Scores
MCC 0.967
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.967 ±
Sensitivity 0.968
Positive Predictive Value 0.968
Nr of predictions 1

^top


2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3W1K_J

tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...

0.97 0.97 0.97 30 1647 1 1 0 0 1

^top


Performance of PETfold_2.0(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 25
Total TN 1649
Total FP 5
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 2
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 6
Total Scores
MCC 0.831
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.831 ±
Sensitivity 0.806
Positive Predictive Value 0.862
Nr of predictions 1

^top


2. Individual counts for PETfold_2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3W1K_J

tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...

0.83 0.81 0.86 25 1649 5 2 2 1 6

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Copyright© - Adam Mickiewicz University & IIMCB - All rights reserved