CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & Pknots [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) Pknots
MCC 0.647 > 0.536
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.639 ± 0.205 > 0.628 ± 0.231
Sensitivity 0.615 > 0.569
Positive Predictive Value 0.691 > 0.517
Total TP 161 > 149
Total TN 19957 > 19902
Total FP 92 < 166
Total FP CONTRA 20 < 36
Total FP INCONS 52 < 103
Total FP COMP 20 < 27
Total FN 101 < 113
P-value 1.34193807955e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Pknots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Pknots).

  2. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Pknots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Pknots).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Pknots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Pknots).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Pknots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Pknots).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 161
Total TN 19957
Total FP 92
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 52
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 101
Total Scores
MCC 0.647
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.639 ± 0.205
Sensitivity 0.615
Positive Predictive Value 0.691
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.49 0.45 0.54 13 5350 15 2 9 4 16
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6
4FRN_A 0.79 0.71 0.87 20 1825 3 1 2 0 8

^top



Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 149
Total TN 19902
Total FP 166
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 103
Total FP COMP 27
Total FN 113
Total Scores
MCC 0.536
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.628 ± 0.231
Sensitivity 0.569
Positive Predictive Value 0.517
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LC8_A 0.83 0.83 0.83 15 510 3 2 1 0 3
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.78 0.76 0.81 22 1506 5 1 4 0 7
3ZEX_C 0.10 0.14 0.08 4 5322 54 13 35 6 25
4A1C_3 0.28 0.30 0.28 11 2723 30 4 25 1 26
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.29 8 4488 36 9 11 16 12
4AOB_A 0.19 0.21 0.21 6 1409 23 3 19 1 23
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 2 0 0 2 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRN_A 0.57 0.54 0.63 15 1824 9 3 6 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.