CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) RDfolder
MCC 0.680 > 0.528
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.671 ± 0.302 > 0.515 ± 0.322
Sensitivity 0.622 > 0.459
Positive Predictive Value 0.760 > 0.630
Total TP 92 > 68
Total TN 5568 < 5581
Total FP 31 < 42
Total FP CONTRA 8 > 7
Total FP INCONS 21 < 33
Total FP COMP 2 = 2
Total FN 56 < 80
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RDfolder).

  4. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 92
Total TN 5568
Total FP 31
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 21
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 56
Total Scores
MCC 0.680
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.671 ± 0.302
Sensitivity 0.622
Positive Predictive Value 0.760
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 68
Total TN 5581
Total FP 42
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 80
Total Scores
MCC 0.528
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.515 ± 0.322
Sensitivity 0.459
Positive Predictive Value 0.630
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 514 14 3 11 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.35 0.24 0.54 7 1520 6 1 5 0 22
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.