CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & RSpredict(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) RSpredict(20)
MCC 0.625 > 0.490
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.634 ± 0.170 > 0.475 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.624 > 0.460
Positive Predictive Value 0.634 > 0.532
Total TP 156 > 115
Total TN 25071 < 25101
Total FP 137 > 127
Total FP CONTRA 31 < 36
Total FP INCONS 59 < 65
Total FP COMP 47 > 26
Total FN 94 < 135
P-value 1.62913390836e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and RSpredict(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RSpredict(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RSpredict(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and RSpredict(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RSpredict(20)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 156
Total TN 25071
Total FP 137
Total FP CONTRA 31
Total FP INCONS 59
Total FP COMP 47
Total FN 94
Total Scores
MCC 0.625
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.634 ± 0.170
Sensitivity 0.624
Positive Predictive Value 0.634
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3J3E_8 0.27 0.33 0.23 5 2720 28 6 11 11 10
3J3F_8 0.42 0.53 0.34 10 4732 35 9 10 16 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3ZEX_C 0.49 0.45 0.54 13 5350 15 2 9 4 16
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top



Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 115
Total TN 25101
Total FP 127
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 65
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 135
Total Scores
MCC 0.490
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.475 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.460
Positive Predictive Value 0.532
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.53 0.50 0.60 9 342 7 0 6 1 9
3J3E_8 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2724 19 5 13 1 15
3J3F_8 0.42 0.47 0.38 9 4737 26 9 6 11 10
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 1 0 0 3
3SD1_A 0.82 0.86 0.78 25 1501 7 5 2 0 4
3ZEX_C 0.34 0.31 0.38 9 5350 19 3 12 4 20
4A1C_3 0.60 0.49 0.75 18 2739 8 0 6 2 19
4A1C_2 0.25 0.30 0.21 6 4487 30 12 11 7 14
4AOB_A 0.33 0.21 0.55 6 1426 5 1 4 0 23
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.51 0.40 0.67 6 487 3 0 3 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.