CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	UNAFold		Cylofold
MCC	0.739	>	0.701
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.764 ± 0.066	>	0.734 ± 0.064
Sensitivity	0.746	>	0.686
Positive Predictive Value	0.741	>	0.725
Total TP	1046	>	962
Total TN	85195	<	85280
Total FP	504	>	465
Total FP CONTRA	90	<	101
Total FP INCONS	275	>	263
Total FP COMP	139	>	101
Total FN	356	<	440
P-value	3.56938820447e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of UNAFold and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and Cylofold).
Comparison of performance of UNAFold and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and Cylofold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and Cylofold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and Cylofold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for UNAFold and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and Cylofold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for UNAFold and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and Cylofold).

^top

Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	1046
Total TN	85195
Total FP	504
Total FP CONTRA	90
Total FP INCONS	275
Total FP COMP	139
Total FN	356

Total Scores
MCC	0.739
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.764 ± 0.066
Sensitivity	0.746
Positive Predictive Value	0.741
Nr of predictions	75

^top

2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2KRL_A	-	0.91	0.87	0.95	20	2003	9	1	0	8	3
2KX8_A	7SK links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	16	355	0	0	0	0	0
2KXM_A	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	7	142	0	0	0	0	1
2KZL_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	13	507	1	0	0	1	0
2L1F_B	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	24	767	0	0	0	0	0
2L1F_A	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	23	740	0	0	0	0	0
2L2K_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	17	332	0	0	0	0	0
2L3C_B	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	225	0	0	0	0	0
2L3E_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	228	1	0	0	1	0
2L3J_B	mir-2985-2 links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	30	955	0	0	0	0	0
2L5Z_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	102	0	0	0	0	0
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	18	339	1	0	0	1	0
2LA5_A	-	0.77	0.71	0.83	5	269	3	0	1	2	2
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.03	0.00	0.00	0	513	15	3	12	0	18
2LDL_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	131	1	0	0	1	0
2LDT_A	-	0.95	0.91	1.00	10	152	0	0	0	0	1
2LI4_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	175	0	0	0	0	0
2LK3_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	91	0	0	0	0	0
2LKR_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	29	2411	6	0	0	6	0
2LWK_A	-	0.95	0.91	1.00	10	197	1	0	0	1	1
2RRC_A	-	0.83	0.71	1.00	5	70	0	0	0	0	2
2XKV_B	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.58	0.64	0.54	7	1822	23	0	6	17	4
2XQD_Y	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.98	0.95	1.00	20	1109	1	0	0	1	1
2XXA_G	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.35	0.34	0.38	12	2013	21	1	19	1	23
2Y9C_V	-	0.75	0.78	0.74	14	887	8	0	5	3	4
2YIE_Z	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	587	15	6	9	0	8
2YIE_X	-	0.53	0.57	0.50	4	536	6	1	3	2	3
3ADB_C	-	0.86	0.85	0.88	28	1787	4	0	4	0	5
3AKZ_H	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.48	0.50	0.48	10	1106	13	4	7	2	10
3AM1_B	-	0.74	0.76	0.73	22	1436	8	3	5	0	7
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.81	0.79	0.83	15	1139	6	0	3	3	4
3IZF_C	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.89	0.91	0.86	32	2603	9	0	5	4	3
3J0L_7	-	0.66	0.70	0.64	7	508	5	2	2	1	3
3J0L_g	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	174	4	0	2	2	2
3J0L_a	-	0.55	0.64	0.50	7	397	8	5	2	1	4
3J0L_2	-	0.30	0.31	0.31	8	2224	25	2	16	7	18
3J0L_1	-	0.75	0.69	0.82	9	473	4	0	2	2	4
3J0L_h	-	0.87	0.81	0.93	26	2112	4	1	1	2	6
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.31	0.33	0.30	7	1136	16	3	13	0	14
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.75	0.75	0.75	15	1092	6	0	5	1	5
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.51	0.57	0.48	12	1194	14	3	10	1	9
3J2C_O	-	0.60	0.61	0.60	25	3945	22	7	10	5	16
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.80	0.82	0.78	28	2984	12	1	7	4	6
3NDB_M	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	44	3670	4	0	0	4	0
3NKB_B	-	0.69	0.74	0.67	14	714	7	0	7	0	5
3NMU_E	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	3	213	5	0	0	5	0
3O58_3	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.42	0.50	0.35	11	4733	34	5	15	14	11
3O58_2	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.87	0.87	0.87	27	2723	12	0	4	8	4
3OVB_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	215	1	0	0	1	0
3OVS_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	204	0	0	0	0	0
3P22_G	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	301	0	0	0	0	0
3PDR_A	ykoK links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.92	0.94	46	4791	5	1	2	2	4
3R4F_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	22	884	1	0	0	1	0
3R9X_C	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	221	2	0	0	2	0
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	20	846	0	0	0	0	4
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.76	0.79	22	1505	6	4	2	0	7
3SIU_F	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	137	0	0	0	0	0
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.95	0.92	1.00	11	143	0	0	0	0	1
3TRZ_Z	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	87	1	0	0	1	0
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	103	0	0	0	0	0
3U4M_B	-	0.49	0.55	0.46	12	1250	14	3	11	0	10
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.49	0.50	0.50	8	1277	15	0	8	7	8
3VJR_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	239	0	0	0	0	0
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.61	0.63	20	1957	13	4	8	1	13
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.88	0.83	0.94	29	2765	6	0	2	4	6
3ZEX_E	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	8255	54	17	32	5	34
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	96	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.60	0.59	0.63	17	1410	11	4	6	1	12
4ATO_G	-	0.38	0.43	0.38	3	212	5	5	0	0	4
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	461	2	0	0	2	4
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.37	0.33	0.45	5	485	7	0	6	1	10
4FNJ_A	-	0.91	0.83	1.00	10	240	0	0	0	0	2
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.36	0.38	0.38	9	1178	15	2	13	0	15
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.48	0.46	0.52	13	1823	12	2	10	0	15
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	89	0	0	0	0	0

^top

Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	962
Total TN	85280
Total FP	465
Total FP CONTRA	101
Total FP INCONS	263
Total FP COMP	101
Total FN	440

Total Scores
MCC	0.701
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.734 ± 0.064
Sensitivity	0.686
Positive Predictive Value	0.725
Nr of predictions	75

^top

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2KRL_A	-	0.85	0.87	0.83	20	2000	12	4	0	8	3
2KX8_A	7SK links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	16	355	0	0	0	0	0
2KXM_A	-	0.78	0.63	1.00	5	144	0	0	0	0	3
2KZL_A	-	0.83	0.69	1.00	9	511	1	0	0	1	4
2L1F_B	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.88	1.00	21	770	0	0	0	0	3
2L1F_A	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.87	1.00	20	743	0	0	0	0	3
2L2K_A	-	0.87	0.76	1.00	13	336	0	0	0	0	4
2L3C_B	-	0.84	0.71	1.00	10	229	0	0	0	0	4
2L3E_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	228	1	0	0	1	0
2L3J_B	mir-2985-2 links to Rfam database...	0.95	0.90	1.00	27	958	0	0	0	0	3
2L5Z_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	102	0	0	0	0	0
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	18	339	1	0	0	1	0
2LA5_A	-	0.77	0.71	0.83	5	269	1	0	1	0	2
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.64	0.61	0.69	11	512	5	1	4	0	7
2LDL_A	-	0.81	0.67	1.00	6	134	0	0	0	0	3
2LDT_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	151	0	0	0	0	0
2LI4_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	175	0	0	0	0	0
2LK3_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	91	0	0	0	0	0
2LKR_A	-	0.56	0.55	0.57	16	2412	13	4	8	1	13
2LWK_A	-	0.95	0.91	1.00	10	197	1	0	0	1	1
2RRC_A	-	0.83	0.71	1.00	5	70	0	0	0	0	2
2XKV_B	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.41	0.55	0.32	6	1816	25	9	4	12	5
2XQD_Y	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.89	0.95	0.83	20	1105	5	4	0	1	1
2XXA_G	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.10	0.11	0.11	4	2009	32	2	30	0	31
2Y9C_V	-	0.72	0.72	0.72	13	888	8	0	5	3	5
2YIE_Z	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	591	11	5	6	0	8
2YIE_X	-	0.43	0.57	0.33	4	532	10	2	6	2	3
3ADB_C	-	0.84	0.82	0.87	27	1788	4	0	4	0	6
3AKZ_H	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.75	0.79	15	1108	7	0	4	3	5
3AM1_B	-	0.83	0.76	0.92	22	1442	2	0	2	0	7
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.79	0.75	15	1137	8	0	5	3	4
3IZF_C	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.83	0.88	29	2607	7	0	4	3	6
3J0L_7	-	0.41	0.50	0.36	5	505	10	3	6	1	5
3J0L_g	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	174	4	0	2	2	2
3J0L_a	-	0.17	0.18	0.20	2	401	9	3	5	1	9
3J0L_2	-	0.49	0.46	0.52	12	2227	18	0	11	7	14
3J0L_1	-	0.73	0.62	0.89	8	475	3	0	1	2	5
3J0L_h	-	0.55	0.50	0.62	16	2114	10	2	8	0	16
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.90	0.81	1.00	17	1142	0	0	0	0	4
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.75	0.68	15	1090	8	2	5	1	5
3J20_0	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.74	0.76	0.73	16	1197	7	3	3	1	5
3J2C_O	-	0.51	0.49	0.54	20	3950	19	1	16	2	21
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.68	0.74	23	2989	11	0	8	3	11
3NDB_M	-	0.68	0.64	0.74	28	3676	14	2	8	4	16
3NKB_B	-	0.46	0.42	0.53	8	720	7	0	7	0	11
3NMU_E	-	0.28	0.33	0.25	1	212	6	1	2	3	2
3O58_3	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.42	0.50	0.35	11	4733	30	9	11	10	11
3O58_2	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.90	0.84	0.96	26	2727	3	0	1	2	5
3OVB_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	215	1	0	0	1	0
3OVS_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	204	0	0	0	0	0
3P22_G	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	11	301	0	0	0	0	0
3PDR_A	ykoK links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.78	0.95	39	4799	4	1	1	2	11
3R4F_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	22	884	1	0	0	1	0
3R9X_C	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	221	2	0	0	2	0
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	20	846	0	0	0	0	4
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.69	0.74	20	1506	7	2	5	0	9
3SIU_F	-	0.86	0.75	1.00	6	139	0	0	0	0	2
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.63	0.42	1.00	5	149	0	0	0	0	7
3TRZ_Z	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	87	1	0	0	1	0
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	103	0	0	0	0	0
3U4M_B	-	0.49	0.55	0.46	12	1250	14	3	11	0	10
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.45	0.50	0.42	8	1274	18	4	7	7	8
3VJR_D	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	12	239	0	0	0	0	0
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.48	0.45	0.52	15	1960	15	1	13	1	18
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.69	0.69	0.71	24	2762	11	5	5	1	11
3ZEX_E	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	8258	51	15	31	5	34
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	96	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.42	0.38	0.48	11	1414	13	3	9	1	18
4ATO_G	-	0.88	1.00	0.78	7	211	2	2	0	0	0
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	15	457	0	0	0	0	0
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.97	1.00	0.94	15	480	1	1	0	0	0
4FNJ_A	-	0.81	0.67	1.00	8	242	0	0	0	0	4
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.88	1.00	21	1181	0	0	0	0	3
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.23	0.18	0.31	5	1832	11	7	4	0	23
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	89	0	0	0	0	0

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]