CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	UNAFold		Murlet(seed)
MCC	0.712	>	0.594
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.725 ± 0.111	>	0.592 ± 0.069
Sensitivity	0.716	>	0.418
Positive Predictive Value	0.717	<	0.855
Total TP	504	>	294
Total TN	49257	<	49616
Total FP	295	>	63
Total FP CONTRA	54	>	5
Total FP INCONS	145	>	45
Total FP COMP	96	>	13
Total FN	200	<	410
P-value	3.56938820447e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of UNAFold and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and Murlet(seed)).
Comparison of performance of UNAFold and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and Murlet(seed)).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and Murlet(seed)).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and Murlet(seed)).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for UNAFold and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and Murlet(seed)).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for UNAFold and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and Murlet(seed)).

^top

Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	504
Total TN	49257
Total FP	295
Total FP CONTRA	54
Total FP INCONS	145
Total FP COMP	96
Total FN	200

Total Scores
MCC	0.712
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.725 ± 0.111
Sensitivity	0.716
Positive Predictive Value	0.717
Nr of predictions	30

^top

2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2KDQ_B	mir-TAR links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	10	164	0	0	0	0	0
2KE6_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	18	449	1	0	0	1	0
2KUR_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	19	448	0	0	0	0	0
2KUU_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	18	429	1	0	0	1	0
2KUV_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	19	420	0	0	0	0	0
2KUW_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	18	452	1	0	0	1	0
2L1F_A	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	23	740	0	0	0	0	0
2L1F_B	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	24	767	0	0	0	0	0
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	1.00	1.00	1.00	18	339	1	0	0	1	0
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.03	0.00	0.00	0	513	15	3	12	0	18
2XKV_B	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.58	0.64	0.54	7	1822	23	0	6	17	4
2XXA_G	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.35	0.34	0.38	12	2013	21	1	19	1	23
3A3A_A	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.97	0.93	1.00	28	1472	0	0	0	0	2
3GX2_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.81	0.79	0.85	22	1423	5	2	2	1	6
3IVN_B	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	19	884	0	0	0	0	4
3JYX_4	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.83	0.45	10	4734	31	10	2	19	2
3LA5_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.84	1.00	21	933	0	0	0	0	4
3NPB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.78	0.94	29	2247	6	0	2	4	8
3O58_3	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.42	0.50	0.35	11	4733	34	5	15	14	11
3PDR_A	ykoK links to Rfam database...	0.93	0.92	0.94	46	4791	5	1	2	2	4
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	20	846	0	0	0	0	4
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.77	0.76	0.79	22	1505	6	4	2	0	7
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.61	0.63	20	1957	13	4	8	1	13
3ZEX_C	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.30	0.34	0.26	10	5336	43	5	23	15	19
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.19	0.25	0.15	5	4483	42	11	17	14	15
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.60	0.59	0.63	17	1410	11	4	6	1	12
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	461	2	0	0	2	4
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.37	0.33	0.45	5	485	7	0	6	1	10
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.36	0.38	0.38	9	1178	15	2	13	0	15
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.48	0.46	0.52	13	1823	12	2	10	0	15

^top

Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	294
Total TN	49616
Total FP	63
Total FP CONTRA	5
Total FP INCONS	45
Total FP COMP	13
Total FN	410

Total Scores
MCC	0.594
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.592 ± 0.069
Sensitivity	0.418
Positive Predictive Value	0.855
Nr of predictions	30

^top

2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2KDQ_B	mir-TAR links to Rfam database...	0.54	0.30	1.00	3	171	0	0	0	0	7
2KE6_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	0.67	0.56	0.83	10	455	2	0	2	0	8
2KUR_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	0.65	0.53	0.83	10	455	2	0	2	0	9
2KUU_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	0.67	0.56	0.83	10	435	2	0	2	0	8
2KUV_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.84	1.00	16	423	0	0	0	0	3
2KUW_A	K10_TLS links to Rfam database...	0.88	0.83	0.94	15	454	2	0	1	1	3
2L1F_A	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.83	0.78	0.90	18	743	2	0	2	0	5
2L1F_B	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.82	0.75	0.90	18	771	2	0	2	0	6
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.57	0.39	0.88	7	349	2	0	1	1	11
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.03	0.00	0.00	0	516	12	0	12	0	18
2XKV_B	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.60	0.36	1.00	4	1831	2	0	0	2	7
2XXA_G	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.41	0.17	1.00	6	2039	0	0	0	0	29
3A3A_A	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.63	0.40	1.00	12	1488	0	0	0	0	18
3GX2_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.70	0.50	1.00	14	1435	1	0	0	1	14
3IVN_B	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.62	0.52	0.75	12	887	4	2	2	0	11
3JYX_4	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.50	0.25	1.00	3	4753	4	0	0	4	9
3LA5_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.67	0.56	0.82	14	937	3	1	2	0	11
3NPB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.59	0.35	1.00	13	2265	2	0	0	2	24
3O58_3	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.52	0.27	1.00	6	4758	1	0	0	1	16
3PDR_A	ykoK links to Rfam database...	0.53	0.28	1.00	14	4826	0	0	0	0	36
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.62	0.50	0.80	12	851	3	1	2	0	12
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.56	0.38	0.85	11	1520	2	0	2	0	18
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.45	0.27	0.75	9	1977	3	0	3	0	24
3ZEX_C	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.49	0.24	1.00	7	5367	0	0	0	0	22
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.59	0.35	1.00	7	4509	0	0	0	0	13
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.69	0.48	1.00	14	1423	1	0	0	1	15
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.63	0.40	1.00	6	466	0	0	0	0	9
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.63	0.40	1.00	6	490	0	0	0	0	9
4FRG_B	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.17	0.13	0.25	3	1190	9	0	9	0	21
4FRN_A	AdoCbl-variant links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.50	0.88	14	1832	2	1	1	0	14

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]