CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for UNAFold & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric UNAFold RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.740 > 0.728
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.771 ± 0.158 > 0.736 ± 0.126
Sensitivity 0.767 > 0.634
Positive Predictive Value 0.721 < 0.843
Total TP 312 > 258
Total TN 30671 < 30798
Total FP 188 > 77
Total FP CONTRA 42 > 17
Total FP INCONS 79 > 31
Total FP COMP 67 > 29
Total FN 95 < 149
P-value 1.23248012054e-07

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of UNAFold and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Comparison of performance of UNAFold and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and RNASampler(seed)).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and RNASampler(seed)).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for UNAFold and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and RNASampler(seed)).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for UNAFold and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 312
Total TN 30671
Total FP 188
Total FP CONTRA 42
Total FP INCONS 79
Total FP COMP 67
Total FN 95
Total Scores
MCC 0.740
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.771 ± 0.158
Sensitivity 0.767
Positive Predictive Value 0.721
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2KE6_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 449 1 0 0 1 0
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 448 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 429 1 0 0 1 0
2KUV_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 420 0 0 0 0 0
2KUW_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 452 1 0 0 1 0
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3A3A_A 0.97 0.93 1.00 28 1472 0 0 0 0 2
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3JYX_4 0.61 0.83 0.45 10 4734 31 10 2 19 2
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 34 5 15 14 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
3W3S_B 0.61 0.61 0.63 20 1957 13 4 8 1 13
3ZEX_C 0.30 0.34 0.26 10 5336 43 5 23 15 19
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 42 11 17 14 15

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 258
Total TN 30798
Total FP 77
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 31
Total FP COMP 29
Total FN 149
Total Scores
MCC 0.728
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.736 ± 0.126
Sensitivity 0.634
Positive Predictive Value 0.843
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2KE6_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 451 1 0 0 1 2
2KUR_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 450 0 0 0 0 2
2KUU_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 431 1 0 0 1 2
2KUV_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 422 0 0 0 0 2
2KUW_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 454 1 0 0 1 2
2L1F_A 0.83 0.70 1.00 16 747 0 0 0 0 7
2L1F_B 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 774 0 0 0 0 7
2L94_A 0.70 0.56 0.91 10 346 2 0 1 1 8
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 10 0 10 0 18
3A3A_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 18 1482 0 0 0 0 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3JYX_4 0.70 0.83 0.59 10 4739 13 6 1 6 2
3O58_3 0.54 0.50 0.58 11 4745 13 5 3 5 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
3W3S_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 12 1977 1 0 0 1 21
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.31 0.50 9 5356 14 2 7 5 20
4A1C_2 0.40 0.40 0.40 8 4496 20 4 8 8 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.