CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Vsfold5 & Mastr(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Vsfold5 Mastr(seed)
MCC 0.556 > 0.282
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.609 ± 0.101 > 0.114 ± 0.083
Sensitivity 0.561 > 0.090
Positive Predictive Value 0.561 < 0.899
Total TP 726 > 116
Total TN 125838 < 127004
Total FP 691 > 16
Total FP CONTRA 172 > 0
Total FP INCONS 397 > 13
Total FP COMP 122 > 3
Total FN 569 < 1179
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Vsfold5 and Mastr(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and Mastr(seed)).

  2. Comparison of performance of Vsfold5 and Mastr(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and Mastr(seed)).

  3. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and Mastr(seed)).

  4. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and Mastr(seed)).

  5. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Vsfold5 and Mastr(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and Mastr(seed)).

  6. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Vsfold5 and Mastr(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and Mastr(seed)).

^top





Performance of Vsfold5 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 726
Total TN 125838
Total FP 691
Total FP CONTRA 172
Total FP INCONS 397
Total FP COMP 122
Total FN 569
Total Scores
MCC 0.556
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.609 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.561
Positive Predictive Value 0.561
Nr of predictions 52

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 165 0 0 0 0 1
2KE6_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 449 1 0 0 1 0
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 448 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 429 1 0 0 1 0
2KUV_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 420 0 0 0 0 0
2KUW_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 452 1 0 0 1 0
2KX8_A 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 356 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_B 0.71 0.63 0.83 15 773 3 0 3 0 9
2L1F_A 0.70 0.61 0.82 14 746 3 0 3 0 9
2L94_A 0.97 0.94 1.00 17 340 1 0 0 1 1
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
2WRQ_Y 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 1144 13 0 0 13 1
2WWQ_V 0.78 0.74 0.82 14 1187 4 1 2 1 5
2XKV_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1803 32 17 15 0 11
2XQD_Y 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1110 1 0 0 1 2
2XXA_G -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 2014 31 2 29 0 35
2ZZM_B 0.17 0.20 0.16 3 1339 25 4 12 9 12
2ZZN_D 0.95 0.95 0.95 21 962 1 1 0 0 1
3A2K_C 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1088 0 0 0 0 2
3A3A_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 27 1473 0 0 0 0 3
3AKZ_H 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1108 1 0 0 1 1
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3G4S_9 0.12 0.15 0.11 4 2699 33 9 24 0 22
3GX2_A 0.61 0.57 0.67 16 1425 9 0 8 1 12
3IVN_B 0.88 0.78 1.00 18 885 0 0 0 0 5
3IYQ_A 0.30 0.37 0.24 19 22361 71 36 24 11 32
3IZ4_A 0.31 0.31 0.33 29 25448 65 14 45 6 66
3IZF_C 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2607 5 0 4 1 6
3J16_L 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1139 0 0 0 0 1
3J20_0 0.76 0.76 0.76 16 1198 6 3 2 1 5
3J20_1 0.75 0.75 0.75 15 1092 7 0 5 2 5
3J2L_3 0.70 0.71 0.71 24 2986 13 3 7 3 10
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1092 19 4 15 0 20
3JYX_4 0.63 0.83 0.48 10 4735 32 9 2 21 2
3JYX_3 0.12 0.13 0.11 2 2360 20 6 10 4 13
3LA5_A -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 938 16 0 16 0 25
3NPB_A 0.62 0.54 0.71 20 2250 10 1 7 2 17
3O58_2 0.50 0.52 0.50 16 2722 19 3 13 3 15
3O58_3 0.51 0.59 0.45 13 4735 28 11 5 12 9
3PDR_A 0.69 0.64 0.74 32 4797 13 3 8 2 18
3RKF_A 0.90 0.92 0.88 22 841 3 3 0 0 2
3SD1_A 0.13 0.14 0.15 4 1507 22 5 17 0 25
3UZL_B 0.24 0.31 0.20 5 1268 20 9 11 0 11
3W3S_B 0.83 0.85 0.82 28 1955 7 2 4 1 5
3ZEX_D 0.09 0.09 0.12 3 2771 24 5 17 2 32
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.28 8 4487 37 8 13 16 12
4A1C_3 0.29 0.30 0.31 11 2727 26 4 21 1 26
4AOB_A 0.21 0.21 0.25 6 1413 19 2 16 1 23
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0
4FRG_B 0.60 0.58 0.64 14 1180 8 3 5 0 10
4FRN_A 0.15 0.14 0.17 4 1825 19 3 16 0 24

^top



Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 116
Total TN 127004
Total FP 16
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 13
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 1179
Total Scores
MCC 0.282
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.114 ± 0.083
Sensitivity 0.090
Positive Predictive Value 0.899
Nr of predictions 52

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 174 0 0 0 0 10
2KE6_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 451 1 0 0 1 2
2KUR_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 15 450 2 0 2 0 4
2KUU_A 0.82 0.78 0.88 14 431 3 0 2 1 4
2KUV_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 15 422 2 0 2 0 4
2KUW_A 0.51 0.50 0.56 9 454 8 0 7 1 9
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 371 0 0 0 0 16
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 357 0 0 0 0 18
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 528 0 0 0 0 18
2WRQ_Y 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1152 0 0 0 0 9
2WWQ_V 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1204 0 0 0 0 19
2XKV_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1835 0 0 0 0 11
2XQD_Y 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1129 0 0 0 0 21
2XXA_G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2045 0 0 0 0 35
2ZZM_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1358 0 0 0 0 15
2ZZN_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 984 0 0 0 0 22
3A2K_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1108 0 0 0 0 22
3A3A_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1500 0 0 0 0 30
3AKZ_H 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1127 0 0 0 0 20
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1157 0 0 0 0 19
3G4S_9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2736 0 0 0 0 26
3GX2_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1449 0 0 0 0 28
3IVN_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 903 0 0 0 0 23
3IYQ_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 22440 0 0 0 0 51
3IZ4_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 25536 0 0 0 0 95
3IZF_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2640 0 0 0 0 35
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1159 0 0 0 0 21
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1219 0 0 0 0 21
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1112 0 0 0 0 20
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3020 0 0 0 0 34
3JYV_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1111 0 0 0 0 20
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4756 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2378 0 0 0 0 15
3LA5_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 954 0 0 0 0 25
3NPB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2278 0 0 0 0 37
3O58_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2754 0 0 0 0 31
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4764 0 0 0 0 22
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4840 0 0 0 0 50
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1293 0 0 0 0 16
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1989 0 0 0 0 33
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2796 0 0 0 0 35
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2763 0 0 0 0 37
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1202 0 0 0 0 24
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1848 0 0 0 0 28

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.