CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	Afold		Cylofold
MCC	0.658	>	0.611
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.701 ± 0.084	>	0.680 ± 0.076
Sensitivity	0.597	>	0.525
Positive Predictive Value	0.731	>	0.717
Total TP	744	>	655
Total TN	143725	<	143829
Total FP	311	>	281
Total FP CONTRA	23	>	18
Total FP INCONS	251	>	241
Total FP COMP	37	>	22
Total FN	503	<	592
P-value	3.56938820447e-08

^top

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of Afold and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Cylofold).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Cylofold).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Cylofold).

^top

Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	744
Total TN	143725
Total FP	311
Total FP CONTRA	23
Total FP INCONS	251
Total FP COMP	37
Total FN	503

Total Scores
MCC	0.658
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.701 ± 0.084
Sensitivity	0.597
Positive Predictive Value	0.731
Nr of predictions	50

^top

2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2KX8_A	7SK links to Rfam database...	0.94	0.89	1.00	16	845	0	0	0	0	2
2KXM_A	-	0.89	0.80	1.00	8	343	0	0	0	0	2
2KZL_A	-	0.86	0.74	1.00	14	1471	0	0	0	0	5
2L1F_B	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.96	0.96	24	2120	1	0	1	0	1
2L1F_A	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.96	0.96	23	2056	1	0	1	0	1
2L2K_A	-	0.94	0.89	1.00	17	844	0	0	0	0	2
2L3C_B	-	0.91	0.82	1.00	14	547	0	0	0	0	3
2L3E_A	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	583	1	0	0	1	1
2L3J_B	mir-2985-2 links to Rfam database...	0.94	0.88	1.00	30	2455	0	0	0	0	4
2L5Z_A	-	0.86	0.75	1.00	9	316	0	0	0	0	3
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.97	0.95	1.00	19	971	0	0	0	0	1
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.55	0.69	11	1524	6	0	5	1	9
2LDL_A	-	0.90	0.82	1.00	9	342	1	0	0	1	2
2LDT_A	-	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	454	0	0	0	0	4
2LI4_A	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	14	482	0	0	0	0	2
2LK3_A	-	0.95	0.90	1.00	9	267	0	0	0	0	1
2LKR_A	-	0.93	0.87	1.00	34	6071	3	0	0	3	5
2LWK_A	-	0.75	0.69	0.82	9	485	2	0	2	0	4
2XXA_G	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.34	0.31	0.39	13	5118	20	1	19	0	29
2YIE_X	-	0.36	0.33	0.40	4	1368	8	2	4	2	8
2YIE_Z	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1525	16	3	12	1	12
3ADB_C	-	0.78	0.74	0.82	28	4152	6	0	6	0	10
3AKZ_H	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.16	0.14	0.19	4	2680	17	2	15	0	24
3AM1_B	-	0.72	0.66	0.79	23	3211	6	0	6	0	12
3IZF_C	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.57	0.76	31	6862	10	1	9	0	23
3J0L_7	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1210	15	1	14	0	17
3J0L_1	-	0.73	0.63	0.86	12	1211	3	0	2	1	7
3J0L_h	-	0.73	0.60	0.90	26	6076	5	0	3	2	17
3J2C_O	-	0.58	0.49	0.69	31	10251	15	1	13	1	32
3NDB_M	-	0.84	0.74	0.96	45	9133	3	0	2	1	16
3NKB_B	-	0.59	0.54	0.67	14	1995	7	0	7	0	12
3NMU_E	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	553	10	1	7	2	6
3O58_3	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.34	0.34	0.34	12	12368	37	2	21	14	23
3O58_2	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.66	0.66	25	7222	14	4	9	1	13
3OVS_D	-	0.80	0.77	0.83	10	549	2	0	2	0	3
3P22_G	-	0.87	0.83	0.91	10	730	1	0	1	0	2
3R4F_A	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	23	2122	0	0	0	0	2
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.59	1.00	20	2191	0	0	0	0	14
3SIU_F	-	0.85	0.73	1.00	8	370	0	0	0	0	3
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.92	1.00	11	395	0	0	0	0	1
3U4M_B	-	0.38	0.32	0.46	12	3134	14	0	14	0	25
3VJR_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	618	1	0	0	1	1
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.50	0.45	0.56	18	4721	15	1	13	1	22
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.72	0.61	0.86	30	6986	5	0	5	0	19
3ZEX_E	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	21892	55	2	51	2	77
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	222	0	0	0	0	0
4ATO_G	-	0.32	0.30	0.38	3	520	6	1	4	1	7
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.67	0.58	0.79	11	1261	3	1	2	0	8
4FNJ_A	-	0.75	0.63	0.91	10	584	1	0	1	0	6
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	319	1	0	0	1	0

^top

Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	655
Total TN	143829
Total FP	281
Total FP CONTRA	18
Total FP INCONS	241
Total FP COMP	22
Total FN	592

Total Scores
MCC	0.611
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.680 ± 0.076
Sensitivity	0.525
Positive Predictive Value	0.717
Nr of predictions	50

^top

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2KX8_A	7SK links to Rfam database...	0.94	0.89	1.00	16	845	0	0	0	0	2
2KXM_A	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	5	346	0	0	0	0	5
2KZL_A	-	0.72	0.53	1.00	10	1475	0	0	0	0	9
2L1F_B	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.92	0.84	1.00	21	2124	0	0	0	0	4
2L1F_A	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	20	2060	0	0	0	0	4
2L2K_A	-	0.82	0.68	1.00	13	848	0	0	0	0	6
2L3C_B	-	0.76	0.59	1.00	10	551	0	0	0	0	7
2L3E_A	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	583	1	0	0	1	1
2L3J_B	mir-2985-2 links to Rfam database...	0.89	0.79	1.00	27	2458	0	0	0	0	7
2L5Z_A	-	0.86	0.75	1.00	9	316	0	0	0	0	3
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.97	0.95	1.00	19	971	0	0	0	0	1
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.55	0.69	11	1524	5	0	5	0	9
2LDL_A	-	0.73	0.55	1.00	6	345	0	0	0	0	5
2LDT_A	-	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	454	0	0	0	0	4
2LI4_A	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	14	482	0	0	0	0	2
2LK3_A	-	0.95	0.90	1.00	9	267	0	0	0	0	1
2LKR_A	-	0.50	0.44	0.59	17	6076	12	2	10	0	22
2LWK_A	-	0.83	0.77	0.91	10	485	1	0	1	0	3
2XXA_G	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.10	0.10	0.11	4	5115	32	1	31	0	38
2YIE_X	-	0.30	0.33	0.29	4	1364	10	2	8	0	8
2YIE_Z	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1529	11	3	8	0	12
3ADB_C	-	0.78	0.71	0.87	27	4155	4	0	4	0	11
3AKZ_H	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.57	0.76	16	2680	6	0	5	1	12
3AM1_B	-	0.76	0.63	0.92	22	3216	2	0	2	0	13
3IZF_C	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.68	0.56	0.83	30	6867	6	0	6	0	24
3J0L_7	-	0.30	0.29	0.33	5	1210	10	0	10	0	12
3J0L_1	-	0.65	0.47	0.90	9	1215	2	0	1	1	10
3J0L_h	-	0.48	0.37	0.62	16	6079	10	0	10	0	27
3J2C_O	-	0.43	0.33	0.55	21	10258	18	0	17	1	42
3NDB_M	-	0.58	0.48	0.71	29	9139	13	1	11	1	32
3NKB_B	-	0.40	0.31	0.53	8	2001	7	0	7	0	18
3NMU_E	-	0.20	0.17	0.25	1	557	6	1	2	3	5
3O58_3	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.36	0.34	0.38	12	12371	29	5	15	9	23
3O58_2	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.80	0.68	0.93	26	7232	3	0	2	1	12
3OVS_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	549	0	0	0	0	1
3P22_G	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	11	730	0	0	0	0	1
3R4F_A	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	23	2122	0	0	0	0	2
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.59	1.00	20	2191	0	0	0	0	14
3SIU_F	-	0.73	0.55	1.00	6	372	0	0	0	0	5
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.64	0.42	1.00	5	401	0	0	0	0	7
3U4M_B	-	0.38	0.32	0.46	12	3134	14	0	14	0	25
3VJR_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	618	0	0	0	0	1
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.44	0.38	0.52	15	4724	15	0	14	1	25
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.58	0.49	0.69	24	6986	11	0	11	0	25
3ZEX_E	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	21897	51	2	46	3	77
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	222	0	0	0	0	0
4ATO_G	-	0.73	0.70	0.78	7	519	2	1	1	0	3
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.89	0.79	1.00	15	1260	0	0	0	0	4
4FNJ_A	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	8	587	0	0	0	0	8
4HXH_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	319	0	0	0	0	0

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]