CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold RDfolder
MCC 0.704 > 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.716 ± 0.074 > 0.641 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.641 > 0.522
Positive Predictive Value 0.781 > 0.748
Total TP 885 > 720
Total TN 98848 < 99019
Total FP 281 > 265
Total FP CONTRA 23 < 25
Total FP INCONS 225 > 217
Total FP COMP 33 > 23
Total FN 495 < 660
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 885
Total TN 98848
Total FP 281
Total FP CONTRA 23
Total FP INCONS 225
Total FP COMP 33
Total FN 495
Total Scores
MCC 0.704
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.716 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.641
Positive Predictive Value 0.781
Nr of predictions 74

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2K5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 0
2K63_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 397 0 0 0 0 1
2K66_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 1
2KD8_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KE6_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 1
2KEZ_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 268 0 0 0 0 2
2KFC_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 622 8 0 8 0 20
2KGP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 291 1 0 0 1 0
2KMJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 367 0 0 0 0 0
2KPV_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 1
2KU0_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 12 691 0 0 0 0 4
2KUR_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KUU_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 3
2KUV_A 0.93 0.86 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2KXM_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 343 0 0 0 0 2
2KZL_A - 0.86 0.74 1.00 14 1471 0 0 0 0 5
2L1F_A 0.96 0.96 0.96 23 2056 1 0 1 0 1
2L1F_B 0.96 0.96 0.96 24 2120 1 0 1 0 1
2L2K_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 844 0 0 0 0 2
2L3C_B - 0.91 0.82 1.00 14 547 0 0 0 0 3
2L3E_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 583 1 0 0 1 1
2L3J_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2455 0 0 0 0 4
2L5Z_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 316 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2RP0_A - 0.58 0.42 0.83 5 345 1 0 1 0 7
2RPT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 0
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_D - 0.18 0.15 0.24 4 1936 13 0 13 0 22
2WW9_E - 0.47 0.29 0.80 4 556 1 0 1 0 10
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 16 3 12 1 12
2YIE_X - 0.36 0.33 0.40 4 1368 8 2 4 2 8
2ZY6_A - 0.55 0.58 0.54 7 690 6 1 5 0 5
2ZZM_B 0.21 0.19 0.25 6 3462 18 0 18 0 26
2ZZN_D 0.80 0.74 0.87 20 2462 3 0 3 0 7
3A2K_C 0.41 0.39 0.44 11 2901 14 2 12 0 17
3A3A_A 0.84 0.70 1.00 26 3629 0 0 0 0 11
3ADB_C - 0.78 0.74 0.82 28 4152 6 0 6 0 10
3AKZ_H 0.16 0.14 0.19 4 2680 17 2 15 0 24
3AM1_B - 0.72 0.66 0.79 23 3211 6 0 6 0 12
3DW4_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 344 7 0 7 0 10
3GCA_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 519 9 0 9 0 17
3HAY_E - 0.91 0.83 1.00 15 2263 7 0 0 7 3
3HJW_D - 0.91 0.89 0.94 16 1636 3 0 1 2 2
3IAB_R - 0.92 0.86 1.00 12 1023 0 0 0 0 2
3ID5_D - 0.40 0.33 0.50 3 490 6 0 3 3 6
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.62 0.58 0.68 19 4250 9 0 9 0 14
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1210 15 1 14 0 17
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.63 0.86 12 1211 3 0 2 1 7
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2827 23 1 22 0 32
3KTW_C - 0.71 0.63 0.82 27 4527 7 2 4 1 16
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NMU_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 553 10 1 7 2 6
3OVS_D - 0.80 0.77 0.83 10 549 2 0 2 0 3
3P22_G - 0.87 0.83 0.91 10 730 1 0 1 0 2
3R4F_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 23 2122 0 0 0 0 2
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SIU_F - 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 370 0 0 0 0 3
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.50 0.45 0.56 18 4721 15 1 13 1 22
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4ATO_G - 0.32 0.30 0.38 3 520 6 1 4 1 7
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 1 0 0 1 0

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 720
Total TN 99019
Total FP 265
Total FP CONTRA 25
Total FP INCONS 217
Total FP COMP 23
Total FN 660
Total Scores
MCC 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.641 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.522
Positive Predictive Value 0.748
Nr of predictions 74

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2K5Z_A - 0.79 0.64 1.00 7 399 0 0 0 0 4
2K63_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 398 0 0 0 0 2
2K66_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 223 0 0 0 0 2
2KD8_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 223 0 0 0 0 1
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KE6_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1113 1 0 0 1 4
2KEZ_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 268 0 0 0 0 2
2KFC_A - 0.49 0.25 1.00 5 625 0 0 0 0 15
2KGP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 291 0 0 0 0 0
2KMJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 367 0 0 0 0 0
2KPV_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 1
2KU0_A - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 696 7 0 7 0 16
2KUR_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 5
2KUU_A 0.84 0.71 1.00 15 1113 1 0 0 1 6
2KUV_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
2KUW_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 5
2KX8_A 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 847 0 0 0 0 4
2KXM_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 5
2KZL_A - 0.78 0.74 0.82 14 1468 3 1 2 0 5
2L1F_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2067 13 2 11 0 24
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L2K_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 844 0 0 0 0 2
2L3C_B - 0.91 0.82 1.00 14 547 0 0 0 0 3
2L3E_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 583 1 0 0 1 1
2L3J_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2455 0 0 0 0 4
2L5Z_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 316 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1526 14 2 12 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 0 0 0 0 2
2LDT_A - 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 458 0 0 0 0 8
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2RP0_A - 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 7
2RPT_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 186 4 1 3 0 7
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 12 5 3 4 7
2WW9_F - 0.71 0.60 0.86 6 293 1 0 1 0 4
2WW9_D - 0.29 0.12 0.75 3 1949 1 0 1 0 23
2WW9_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 556 5 0 5 0 14
2YIE_Z - 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 1529 6 3 3 0 7
2YIE_X - 0.38 0.33 0.44 4 1369 5 1 4 0 8
2ZY6_A - 0.58 0.58 0.58 7 691 5 1 4 0 5
2ZZM_B 0.10 0.09 0.13 3 3462 21 1 20 0 29
2ZZN_D 0.84 0.78 0.91 21 2462 2 0 2 0 6
3A2K_C 0.86 0.75 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 7
3A3A_A 0.53 0.41 0.71 15 3634 6 0 6 0 22
3ADB_C - 0.46 0.39 0.54 15 4158 13 0 13 0 23
3AKZ_H 0.48 0.43 0.55 12 2679 11 1 9 1 16
3AM1_B - 0.47 0.43 0.54 15 3212 13 1 12 0 20
3DW4_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 347 4 0 4 0 10
3GCA_A - 0.54 0.29 1.00 5 523 0 0 0 0 12
3HAY_E - 0.91 0.83 1.00 15 2263 6 0 0 6 3
3HJW_D - 0.85 0.78 0.93 14 1638 3 0 1 2 4
3IAB_R - 0.86 0.86 0.86 12 1021 4 1 1 2 2
3ID5_D - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 490 6 3 3 0 9
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4268 10 0 10 0 33
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 2 0 1 1 10
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2830 20 0 20 0 32
3KTW_C - 0.08 0.07 0.12 3 4535 23 0 22 1 40
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NKB_B - 0.37 0.31 0.47 8 1999 9 0 9 0 18
3NMU_E - 0.41 0.17 1.00 1 560 3 0 0 3 5
3OVS_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 1
3P22_G - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 731 0 0 0 0 2
3R4F_A - 0.76 0.68 0.85 17 2125 3 1 2 0 8
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3W3S_B 0.27 0.23 0.33 9 4726 18 1 17 0 31
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4ATO_G - 0.63 0.40 1.00 4 524 0 0 0 0 6
4ENB_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1265 4 0 4 0 13
4HXH_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 319 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.